Skip to main content
AcademicWings STEM discovery

QS ranking profile

Yokohama National University

Japan Public

This page presents clearly labeled QS ranking data for orientation. It does not verify programs, supervisors, funding, admission requirements, or the university's website.

QS 2026 rank
#1,001
No change since 2025
QS 2025 rank
#1,001
Overall score
Not published
Verified Catalog STEM PhDs, Postdocs & Fellowships

Explore opportunities at Yokohama National University

Browse active research positions, doctoral fellowships, and university funding calls indexed from official faculties and verified sources.

QS indicators

Reported ranking indicators

Each indicator is scored out of 100 in the same QS snapshot as the summary above.

Academic reputation 11.6

#701 worldwide

Employer reputation 24.5

#548 worldwide

Faculty-student ratio 22.9

#777 worldwide

Citations per faculty 11.3

#801 worldwide

International faculty ratio 17.2

#762 worldwide

International student ratio 12.5

#801 worldwide

International student diversity 18.2

#792 worldwide

International research network 28.1

#801 worldwide

Employment outcomes 22.5

#684 worldwide

Sustainability 41.2

#801 worldwide

Institution profile

How QS classifies this institution

QS groups institutions by size, subject range, and research output.

Size
Medium
About 5,000 to 12,000 students
Subject range
Comprehensive
Teaches across all main faculty areas
Research intensity
Very high
Very high research output in the QS classification
Region
Asia
QS regional grouping

University profile

About Yokohama National University

Editorial background written for orientation. Verify programs, funding, and admission on the university's official pages.

Yokohama National University separates research topics, centres, policy, and collaboration

Yokohama National University makes research visible through several distinct routes: research topics, a researcher search, YNU Research Centers, a repository, policies, and organizations. Its English research pages also distinguish joint research, commissioned research, technical consultations, collaborative laboratories, and partner institutions. This arrangement separates what each route can illuminate. A researcher search can help identify a person and the language attached to a topic. A center can show a setting where several people and facilities meet. A repository can point toward work already made available. A policy or organization page can explain how activity is arranged without claiming that every question belongs in the same place.

YNU's colleges in education, economics, business administration, engineering science, and urban sciences create further context for a question that crosses fields. Its graduate schools add education, international social sciences, engineering science, environment and information sciences, urban innovation, and innovative and practical studies. A city question may involve a built environment, data, governance, business practice, or public learning. A technical question may need an engineering system, an environmental condition, an information process, or an organizational decision. Begin by identifying the object whose behavior or meaning needs explanation before selecting a college or graduate-school label.

YNU's research map makes a practical question visible before a partnership begins

The YNU research area places Researcher and Research Topics beside Collaboration, Research Policy, and Organizations. That order can help a reader avoid beginning with a partnership when the question itself is still vague. A joint project makes more sense after the system or issue has been identified. For example, a question about an urban service might concern a digital interface, a building, a transport decision, a local environmental condition, or the experience of residents. A question about information and environment might concern a dataset, sensor, model, energy use, or a rule that shapes how a system is managed. Each possibility requires a different form of information and a different institutional setting.

The page also lists technical consultations, collaborative laboratories, and joint or commissioned research projects. These options point toward practical engagement, but they do not make every topic applied in the same way. A laboratory may be relevant when a question needs testing or measurement. A consultation may be relevant when a defined technical issue needs specialist discussion. A partner institution may matter when a comparison or shared setting is essential. For a focused YNU inquiry, name the subject of study, its location, and the observation that matters. Only then can a reader judge whether a researcher, center, laboratory, or collaboration route is the right next place to explore.

YNU questions become clearer when their system, setting, and collaborator are named

For Yokohama National University, a strong question can begin with a system and its setting. It might involve an engineering device in a laboratory, an urban service in a neighborhood, an environmental signal in a local area, an economic decision in an organization, or a learning practice in a school. The next step is to name what could make the issue observable: measurements, maps, code, documents, interviews, images, samples, usage records, or a designed comparison. This makes it easier to search the university's researcher and topic pages without treating a broad keyword as proof of a close fit.

YNU's research centers, repository, policy pages, and collaboration options can then deepen a question that already has boundaries. A center may reveal a shared area of work. A repository may show how a previous problem was framed. A policy can clarify the conditions around collaboration. A partner route can matter when another setting is necessary to understand the object. The most useful direction is not the widest interdisciplinary phrase. It is the one in which a system, a place, the people or materials involved, and a possible form of inquiry remain connected from the start.