Skip to main content
AcademicWings STEM discovery

QS ranking profile

Pohang University of Science And Technology (POSTECH)

Republic of Korea Private not for Profit

This page presents clearly labeled QS ranking data for orientation. It does not verify programs, supervisors, funding, admission requirements, or the university's website.

QS 2026 rank
#102
Down 4 places since 2025
QS 2025 rank
#98
Overall score
67.9
Verified Catalog STEM PhDs, Postdocs & Fellowships

Explore opportunities at Pohang University of Science And Technology (POSTECH)

Browse active research positions, doctoral fellowships, and university funding calls indexed from official faculties and verified sources.

QS indicators

Reported ranking indicators

Each indicator is scored out of 100 in the same QS snapshot as the summary above.

Academic reputation 61.3

#166 worldwide

Employer reputation 83.3

#94 worldwide

Faculty-student ratio 99.9

#27 worldwide

Citations per faculty 98.3

#45 worldwide

International faculty ratio 31.6

#568 worldwide

International student ratio 4.2

#801 worldwide

International student diversity 8.3

#801 worldwide

International research network 29.6

#801 worldwide

Employment outcomes 16

#801 worldwide

Sustainability 64.3

#415 worldwide

Institution profile

How QS classifies this institution

QS groups institutions by size, subject range, and research output.

Size
Small
Fewer than 5,000 students
Subject range
Full comprehensive
All main faculty areas, including a medical school
Research intensity
Very high
Very high research output in the QS classification
Region
Asia
QS regional grouping

University profile

About Pohang University of Science And Technology (POSTECH)

Editorial background written for orientation. Verify programs, funding, and admission on the university's official pages.

POSTECH makes the route from a question to a researcher visible

POSTECH's research navigation separates research facts, research highlights, a researcher search, research organisations, infrastructure, centres, and support services. This is a useful arrangement for someone who wants to move from a broad interest to an identifiable academic setting. Research facts and highlights can introduce a subject, but a researcher or organisation page is more likely to show where the work is taking place. Start with the question, then use the menu to find the person, unit, or centre that names an adjacent problem. This avoids treating a university-wide research menu as if it described every laboratory in the same way.

The POSTECH menu also places research centres beside infrastructure, equipment loans, and an area called LabCumentary. These elements answer different questions. A centre can point toward an organised research community; infrastructure can indicate the type of environment that may support work; a documentary or highlight can provide vocabulary and examples. None should automatically be read as proof of a particular research fit. The useful test is whether a local page connects the research object, the approach, and the people involved. If one of those pieces is missing, keep the connection as a lead rather than a conclusion.

Research organisation and technical resources should be read together

POSTECH lists research organisation, research centres, equipment loans, and research support as separate public routes. That distinction is valuable for technical questions. An equipment page may show a capability, but it may not explain which group uses it or what scientific question it serves. A research centre may show a thematic home, but it may not show the detail of an individual project. Bring the sources together carefully. Identify the unit closest to the subject, then ask whether the visible infrastructure has a clear relationship to the experiments, calculations, measurements, or materials involved in that unit's stated work.

The public material also names areas connected with industry-academia cooperation, technology transfer, and entrepreneurship. These items can give context for work that crosses a laboratory boundary or reaches toward implementation. They should not turn every technical topic into an assumption about external activity. A particular research group may have a different emphasis from the institution's central menu. For a sound comparison, record the local scientific or engineering question first. Add an industry or translation element only after a specific centre, project, or researcher page makes that aspect visible for the area you are considering.

Use POSTECH's public structure to make a narrow research note

A practical POSTECH note starts with one well-defined problem. It might concern a material, device, computational method, biological process, or environmental system. Use the researcher search and research organisation pages to locate the closest academic home, then compare the public description with the method you want to use or learn. The connection becomes meaningful when it can be stated in ordinary language: the same measurement problem, the same physical system, a compatible model, or a related engineering constraint. A broad term by itself is not enough to establish that link.

POSTECH's central research navigation is most valuable as a route planner. It can help distinguish current highlights from durable organisations, and technical resources from the team responsible for research. Keep the resulting entry concise but specific. Name the local unit, state the visible research focus, and identify what needs a fresh check. This method prevents a profile from making promises on behalf of a large institution. It also leaves room for a later review of current laboratory pages, which is where a prospective researcher can see whether a promising route has become a real academic fit.