Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM)
#134
QS World University Rankings 2026
64.1
QS 2026 overall score
Ranking data
QS World University Rankings source#134
QS World University Rankings 2026
#148
QS World University Rankings 2025
64.1
QS 2026 overall score
Indicator-level data
Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.
Academic reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 75.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #108
Employer reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 73.4
- QS 2026 rank
- #133
Faculty-student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 66.8
- QS 2026 rank
- #258
Citations per faculty
- QS 2026 score
- 38.3
- QS 2026 rank
- #487
International faculty ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 45.2
- QS 2026 rank
- #467
International student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 98.4
- QS 2026 rank
- #84
International student diversity
- QS 2026 score
- 98.5
- QS 2026 rank
- #71
International research network
- QS 2026 score
- 86.8
- QS 2026 rank
- #221
Employment outcomes
- QS 2026 score
- 23.2
- QS 2026 rank
- #666
Sustainability
- QS 2026 score
- 68.9
- QS 2026 rank
- #331
About Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM)
Start with the academic route, not the whole UPM website
Universiti Putra Malaysia, usually called UPM, presents programme information alongside undergraduate, postgraduate, distance-learning, and foundation routes. It also separates its public navigation into academics, research, linkages, campus services, and institutional information. For someone exploring a research degree, that layout is a useful first map. It shows that a broad subject interest needs to become a specific academic route before it can become a serious option. Begin with the postgraduate area that is closest to your planned field, then identify the faculty, school, or department responsible for the work. The most useful question is simple: where inside UPM would this topic actually be taught, developed, and discussed?
That first step prevents a common mistake. A subject may appear in a general programme list, a research page, and a university news item, yet those pages can serve different purposes. The programme is the academic home. Research material can show the wider setting around it. A campus or institutional page may help with context but cannot explain the intellectual shape of a particular course or project. Keep a small record of the route you find, including its exact name, the unit that manages it, and the words used to describe the field. Those details make later comparisons more useful than a broad impression of a large university.
Read research and linkages as context around a field
UPM's public structure places research and linkages beside academic programmes. That is helpful for a reader whose interests connect with a practical problem, an external partner, or work that crosses more than one discipline. The relationship still needs to be traced carefully. A university-wide research or linkage page can point toward an area of activity, but it does not automatically show how a particular student route is organised. Look for the connection between the postgraduate programme, the people working in the area, and the research setting described by the relevant unit. When all three are visible, the subject becomes much easier to assess in realistic terms.
The official site also makes food security visible within its public structure. If that topic relates to your work, treat it as a research lead rather than a finished explanation of fit. Find the current unit, group, or programme that gives the theme an academic base. The same approach works for any field. Identify a question you care about, the method or knowledge you hope to build, and the UPM unit where those two things meet. This is more reliable than collecting general themes from a homepage. It also helps distinguish an institutional priority from the daily research environment that matters for one individual path.
Build a focused UPM comparison note
A practical UPM note can have four parts: the named postgraduate route, its academic home, one current research connection, and a short account of your own preparation. The research connection may be a topic, a laboratory approach, a dataset, a field setting, or a problem that appears in the unit's work. Your preparation might come from a previous project, technical training, professional experience, or a research question made clearer through earlier work and reflection. Writing these points together is a useful test. If the paragraph could describe any university, return to the relevant UPM pages and make the connection more concrete.
Before taking the next step, revisit the material maintained by the specific programme and academic unit. University navigation gives a broad map, while local pages carry the detail that shapes an individual route. Staff interests, programme content, and research activity can change, so an early note should stay open to revision. This profile is most useful when it leads you toward evidence close to the subject you want to pursue. A clear link between your question, the programme, and the local research setting gives a much stronger basis for deciding whether Universiti Putra Malaysia should remain in your active comparison.
Institution record
- Country
- Malaysia
- Region
- Asia
- Status
- Public
- QS size code
- L
- Profile record updated
- July 24, 2026
This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.
Search opportunitiesOpportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.