Victoria University of Wellington
#240
QS World University Rankings 2026
51.3
QS 2026 overall score
Ranking data
QS World University Rankings source#240
QS World University Rankings 2026
#244
QS World University Rankings 2025
51.3
QS 2026 overall score
Indicator-level data
Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.
Academic reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 57.2
- QS 2026 rank
- #192
Employer reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 32.2
- QS 2026 rank
- #445
Faculty-student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 15.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
Citations per faculty
- QS 2026 score
- 44.3
- QS 2026 rank
- #424
International faculty ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 100
- QS 2026 rank
- #96
International student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 56.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #367
International student diversity
- QS 2026 score
- 60.9
- QS 2026 rank
- #332
International research network
- QS 2026 score
- 70.1
- QS 2026 rank
- #530
Employment outcomes
- QS 2026 score
- 77.6
- QS 2026 rank
- #168
Sustainability
- QS 2026 score
- 83.3
- QS 2026 rank
- #132
About Victoria University of Wellington
Victoria University of Wellington places research beside public and community engagement
Te Herenga Waka, Victoria University of Wellington, presents research alongside teaching, public engagement, relationships with business and government, Māori and Pasifika activity, and global engagement. This is useful context for a question that has a public, cultural, policy, or regional dimension. That institutional context cannot demonstrate that individual academic units share a single research practice. A capital-city setting or public-engagement statement can show the wider environment, while a faculty, school, centre, project, or researcher page is needed to identify the current work. The research connection becomes stronger when it names a defined object and the evidence or methods used to investigate it.
The public site makes faculties and schools visible together with research, library, and community routes. A question involving climate, public services, health, technology, design, law, culture, or Pacific communities may have more than one possible academic home. Choose the field that supplies the main research method first, then look for the local group that makes the secondary dimensions visible. This prevents a broad institutional connection from becoming a personal claim too early. It also makes the comparison more useful when a topic needs both technical analysis and social, cultural, legal, or public evidence.
Ethics, research support, and commercialisation describe different parts of the environment
Victoria University of Wellington's research pages bring together human ethics, animal ethics, tikanga Māori and research, intellectual property, a Research Office, the Faculty of Graduate Research, and Wellington UniVentures. These elements explain several conditions around research work. Ethics pages can be especially relevant where a study involves people, animals, cultural responsibilities, or sensitive information. The Research Office and faculty structures show university-level routes around researchers. Wellington UniVentures describes a route from research toward commercialisation. These are useful context, but they do not explain the method or intellectual direction of a particular project. The local research group must carry that part of the comparison.
The public material also points to research impact, research news and commentary, and ways to work with researchers. These sources can help identify current vocabulary and examples. They should be treated as dated or general evidence until a local unit confirms the connection. A public story may describe a climate issue, a health question, or a social challenge without showing how every related group works. Follow the lead to the researcher or project responsible for it. Then check whether the work uses a method, setting, evidence base, or problem definition that is genuinely close to your own research direction.
Build a Wellington comparison that respects different kinds of evidence
A Victoria University of Wellington research note works best when it keeps institutional context and local research practice separate. Write down the object of study, then identify the faculty, school, centre, project, or researcher closest to it. The object may be a Pacific issue, climate impact, public-service question, health matter, digital system, design challenge, or another defined subject. Next, state the method or evidence that creates the connection. It might be policy analysis, interviews, laboratory work, field observation, modelling, data analysis, design practice, or a mixed approach. If the link can only be described through a broad faculty or public theme, more local material is needed.
End with a question for a future check. A university-wide ethics page cannot describe the decisions of every project, and a public-engagement statement cannot reveal the working relationships of a particular group. These are normal limits, not defects. Documenting them makes the profile easier to revise when researchers, projects, or group pages change. The central material at Te Herenga Waka provides a rich way to discover possible routes into research. A fair comparison still depends on the source closest to the current work. Keeping that principle visible helps transform a wide institutional map into a specific and testable research lead.
Institution record
- Country
- New Zealand
- Region
- Oceania
- Status
- Public
- QS size code
- L
- Profile record updated
- July 24, 2026
This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.
Search opportunitiesOpportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.