Chalmers University of Technology
#165
QS World University Rankings 2026
60.2
QS 2026 overall score
Ranking data
QS World University Rankings source#165
QS World University Rankings 2026
#139
QS World University Rankings 2025
60.2
QS 2026 overall score
Indicator-level data
Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.
Academic reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 34.6
- QS 2026 rank
- #350
Employer reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 56.6
- QS 2026 rank
- #207
Faculty-student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 59.5
- QS 2026 rank
- #303
Citations per faculty
- QS 2026 score
- 80.9
- QS 2026 rank
- #152
International faculty ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 100
- QS 2026 rank
- #56
International student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 74.3
- QS 2026 rank
- #257
International student diversity
- QS 2026 score
- 76.8
- QS 2026 rank
- #226
International research network
- QS 2026 score
- 77
- QS 2026 rank
- #405
Employment outcomes
- QS 2026 score
- 53.3
- QS 2026 rank
- #319
Sustainability
- QS 2026 score
- 82.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #138
About Chalmers University of Technology
Chalmers research can be explored through projects, people, departments, and infrastructure
Chalmers University of Technology presents research through areas of advance, research infrastructure, departments, scientists, and work connected with social and environmental challenges. Its research portal adds practical search routes for projects, publications, people, organizations, funders, and collaborations. This is particularly helpful for a reader who wants to move beyond a broad engineering or technology label. A project page can reveal a concrete problem. A publication list can show scholarly output. A person profile can help identify expertise. A department page can show an academic home. These sources have different roles and should be combined carefully rather than treated as one kind of proof.
The public portal gives examples ranging from wind turbines to black holes, which illustrates the range of research questions that can appear within the same university. Such examples do not mean that every department covers both topics. They show why a comparison needs to begin with the object of research. A question about energy might involve materials, systems, policy, behavior, or infrastructure. A question about data may sit within computing, physics, design, or another setting. Use the portal to find the nearest project or person, then check whether the local description identifies a method and a question that match what is actually being explored.
Research portals are strongest when they lead to a local source
Chalmers Research makes it possible to browse information by organization, person, project, publication, and collaboration. This is a useful way to build an evidence trail. Begin with a narrow search term, then compare the results by their research object rather than by a headline alone. A project may focus on an applied problem, a publication may describe completed work, and a researcher profile may show a broader line of inquiry. The strongest connection is the one that can be explained with plain facts: what is being studied, where the work sits, and what form of evidence or method is visible in the public description.
The university-wide pages also refer to research infrastructure and doctoral research training. These can matter for a research setting, but they should not be assumed to be available or relevant in the same way for every project. An infrastructure page may describe a shared resource, while a local research group may use only part of it or work with a different tool. Record the relationship precisely. This keeps a profile from turning a general institutional resource into an unsupported statement about a particular research path. It also makes later rechecking easier when projects and public pages change.
Build a Chalmers comparison with a searchable evidence trail
A useful Chalmers University of Technology note can start with one object, such as a transport system, a material, an energy process, a computing question, or a physical phenomenon. Use the research portal to locate a project, person, or organization that names the object. Then inspect the local page for methods and evidence. The work might involve experiments, simulation, design, measurement, software, field data, or collaboration with external organizations. State the visible connection without enlarging it into an institution-wide claim. This method makes the profile practical for readers who need to compare specific research work rather than general subject labels.
Close with a recheck question. Is the project current? Does the named person still work on the same topic? Does the department description explain the work more clearly than the portal entry? Asking these questions keeps the comparison honest. Chalmers provides a particularly useful public path because its portal separates people, projects, publications, and organizations. The final assessment should still be grounded in the closest current source that can show the research object and the way the group approaches it.
Institution record
- Country
- Sweden
- Region
- Europe
- Status
- Private not for Profit
- QS size code
- M
- Profile record updated
- July 24, 2026
This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.
Search opportunitiesOpportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.