Lund University
#72
QS World University Rankings 2026
75.7
QS 2026 overall score
Ranking data
QS World University Rankings source#72
QS World University Rankings 2026
#75
QS World University Rankings 2025
75.7
QS 2026 overall score
Indicator-level data
Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.
Academic reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 80.1
- QS 2026 rank
- #99
Employer reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 64.1
- QS 2026 rank
- #167
Faculty-student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 68.1
- QS 2026 rank
- #246
Citations per faculty
- QS 2026 score
- 56.6
- QS 2026 rank
- #312
International faculty ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 98.8
- QS 2026 rank
- #134
International student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 82
- QS 2026 rank
- #213
International student diversity
- QS 2026 score
- 83.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #181
International research network
- QS 2026 score
- 97.1
- QS 2026 rank
- #35
Employment outcomes
- QS 2026 score
- 96.1
- QS 2026 rank
- #65
Sustainability
- QS 2026 score
- 98.8
- QS 2026 rank
- #3
About Lund University
Research themes that link fields together
Lund University describes research and innovation through four broad areas: a sustainable planet, future technology, better health, and open societies. The themes bring together questions that can cross faculty boundaries. Environmental and climate work can connect with engineering, science, or social research. Health-related work can involve medicine, technology, and data. Future technology can cover topics from communication systems to energy. These themes are useful for finding a direction on the university site, but they are not a replacement for the department, research group, or facility where a project is based.
The research pages also point to current stories, researchers, doctoral studies, infrastructures, strategic research areas, and faculty links. This gives a practical way to move beyond a broad theme. Start with the theme that fits your question, then trace it to the relevant faculty and a smaller research setting. A current research story may reveal useful search terms, but a group or researcher page will usually provide a more reliable picture of methods and active work. That sequence helps keep a shortlist tied to visible evidence rather than general interest.
Faculties, infrastructure, and research context
Lund's central research material links to engineering, medicine, and science faculties, while separately directing readers to humanities and theology, social sciences, law, economics and management, and fine and performing arts. It also names research infrastructure and references MAX IV in the university's research and innovation material. This layout is useful for people whose topic spans an established discipline and a shared technical resource. It shows where to look next, but it does not establish that a facility or group is part of every research path.
The university frames research in terms of issues such as environmental and climate pressures, disease prevention and diagnosis, energy, digitalisation, and public debate. A prospective researcher can use those areas to test whether a topic is being approached at the right level. Look for the research unit that turns a general concern into a defined question. Then check whether its recent work uses approaches that make sense for your own preparation. This is more informative than matching yourself to a theme solely because its name sounds familiar.
Making a grounded Lund University shortlist
A strong Lund University shortlist note should identify a research question, the faculty where it belongs, and a small number of current groups or researchers that make the fit specific. Record what you observed instead of relying on broad impressions. You might note a method, a laboratory setting, a research problem, or a link between two fields. If the available evidence is only a university-level theme, leave the item open until a local academic home can be confirmed. Being precise at this stage saves time later.
Use the central site to understand the overall research map, and use faculty and group pages to decide whether a particular direction is relevant. The numerical panel before this text offers a broad comparison aid; it cannot judge the value of one research project or academic relationship. Research pages change as new work develops, so revisit the material that is closest to your intended field before relying on it. This keeps the final comparison current and connected to the work you actually want to do.
Institution record
- Country
- Sweden
- Region
- Europe
- Status
- Public
- QS size code
- L
- Profile record updated
- July 24, 2026
This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.
Search opportunitiesOpportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.