University of Gothenburg
#202
QS World University Rankings 2026
55.5
QS 2026 overall score
Ranking data
QS World University Rankings source#202
QS World University Rankings 2026
#194
QS World University Rankings 2025
55.5
QS 2026 overall score
Indicator-level data
Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.
Academic reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 46.4
- QS 2026 rank
- #252
Employer reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 24.6
- QS 2026 rank
- #546
Faculty-student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 73
- QS 2026 rank
- #211
Citations per faculty
- QS 2026 score
- 45.4
- QS 2026 rank
- #408
International faculty ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 94.1
- QS 2026 rank
- #190
International student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 85.8
- QS 2026 rank
- #191
International student diversity
- QS 2026 score
- 87.1
- QS 2026 rank
- #161
International research network
- QS 2026 score
- 93.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #104
Employment outcomes
- QS 2026 score
- 71
- QS 2026 rank
- #205
Sustainability
- QS 2026 score
- 92.9
- QS 2026 rank
- #36
About University of Gothenburg
University of Gothenburg research is organised across broad areas and local projects
The University of Gothenburg presents research through areas that include sustainability and environment, health and medicine, culture and languages, science and information technology, society and economics, and education and learning. This layout is a useful first map for a question that may not fit neatly inside one discipline. It should not be mistaken for a detailed account of current work. A topic about environmental change can be investigated through field science, data, public policy, history, or education. A question about technology can have social, medical, cultural, or scientific dimensions. The local project, research group, or researcher is where those distinctions become clear.
The university's home material also points to research along Sweden's west coast, with public references to life, environment, and history in that regional setting. This can be useful for a place-based question involving marine systems, ecological change, cultural records, or public life. A coastal theme is not automatically relevant to every discipline. Use it as a route into the current research pages, then find the group or project that identifies the object, evidence, and methods. This keeps a regional description from becoming a vague claim about the whole university and makes it easier to compare one specific research setting with another.
Projects, groups, profiles, and infrastructure answer separate research questions
Gothenburg's research site provides routes to research projects, research groups, research profiles, doctoral studies, and research infrastructure. Each route can add a different piece of evidence. A current project can reveal a live research problem. A group can identify the organisational setting. A profile can help locate a researcher. Infrastructure can clarify a practical condition for particular kinds of work. Use them in combination, but do not assume they have the same meaning. A large facility may serve many fields, and a project title may cover several methods. The most useful connection is the one that can explain how a particular research object is being studied by a visible group or researcher.
The university also describes participation in national strategic research areas. This provides institutional context around subjects that are organised beyond one department. It does not settle whether a specific project relates to your question. A strategic area may contain many groups with different data, methods, and objectives. Record it as background, then look for the smaller unit that makes the research direction concrete. This is especially valuable for topics that move between science, information technology, health, education, or society. The evidence should show where the core method sits rather than simply repeating a cross-disciplinary category.
Create a Gothenburg research map with two levels of evidence
A University of Gothenburg research map can use two linked levels. The first identifies the broad area that gives the question an initial location. The second identifies the current local work that supplies a more precise connection. The research object might be a marine environment, public-health issue, language practice, information system, learning process, cultural record, or economic question. The local evidence should name a project, group, profile, or infrastructure setting and explain the method or material involved. A shared term alone is not enough. A clear map tells the reader why that unit is more relevant than another group using similar language.
Include one open question in the final note. A project may have ended, a facility may not be used by the group you are examining, or a broad research area may be much wider than the intended topic. These are normal limits of central public material. Keeping them visible makes the comparison easier to update. Return to the closest official source when new information appears and test the same research object, academic home, and method again. This approach turns Gothenburg's broad public research map into a set of specific, revisable research leads without overclaiming what the central categories can show.
Institution record
- Country
- Sweden
- Region
- Europe
- Status
- Public
- QS size code
- L
- Profile record updated
- July 24, 2026
This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.
Search opportunitiesOpportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.