Uppsala University
#93
QS World University Rankings 2026
70.3
QS 2026 overall score
Ranking data
QS World University Rankings source#93
QS World University Rankings 2026
#103
QS World University Rankings 2025
70.3
QS 2026 overall score
Indicator-level data
Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.
Academic reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 74.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #113
Employer reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 48.1
- QS 2026 rank
- #268
Faculty-student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 66.3
- QS 2026 rank
- #260
Citations per faculty
- QS 2026 score
- 55.9
- QS 2026 rank
- #318
International faculty ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 99.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #106
International student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 82.9
- QS 2026 rank
- #207
International student diversity
- QS 2026 score
- 84.5
- QS 2026 rank
- #174
International research network
- QS 2026 score
- 95.9
- QS 2026 rank
- #60
Employment outcomes
- QS 2026 score
- 82.9
- QS 2026 rank
- #145
Sustainability
- QS 2026 score
- 94.4
- QS 2026 rank
- #26
About Uppsala University
A broad research agenda with searchable entry points
Uppsala University presents research across a wide range of questions, from the development of life to climate challenges, renewable energy, antibiotic resistance, and other scientific and social concerns. Its research pages also point toward research projects, researchers, departments, themes, and more than fifty research areas. This gives a useful structure for an early search. A broad topic can be narrowed through the university's own research language, then tested against a project or researcher record. The aim is to find where the question becomes specific, rather than assume that a general theme represents the same work across the institution.
The research directory and University Directory can help separate institutional scope from local activity. A theme may show how a topic is discussed across the university, while a project page may reveal the question being studied and the researchers involved. This difference matters for any field that uses a common word in many ways, including sustainability, health, data, energy, or environment. Start with the theme, but make the comparison only after finding the department, research area, or team that gives the topic a clear methodological and intellectual setting.
Complex challenges, sustainability, and collaboration
Uppsala's research material describes the Uppsala University Future Institutes as an initiative for complex societal challenges. It also highlights research collaboration and development through an Innovation Partnership Office. These public structures can be useful when a question connects disciplinary research with a larger problem outside a single field. They do not show that every project follows the same model. Look for the unit that defines the challenge in research terms, explains the evidence being used, and names the people or partnerships directly involved. That is the point where an institutional initiative becomes relevant to a personal research comparison.
The Graduate School in Sustainability Studies brings departments together around several research projects connected with climate-related change. This is a clear example of a university-wide theme taking a more focused form. It can help researchers interested in environmental work see how collaboration may be organised across departments. At the same time, it should be read as one part of the wider landscape. A good fit depends on whether the particular project, method, and local research setting match the question you want to investigate. Keep the evidence tied to those specific elements.
Making an Uppsala University research comparison concrete
A useful Uppsala University note begins with a defined question, then names a research area, department, project, or researcher that appears closest to it. Add a sentence about the method, system, or evidence that creates the overlap. It might be a biological process, energy system, climate measure, computational model, social issue, or another precise focus. If the only connection is a wide label such as sustainability or innovation, keep searching. The purpose is to identify a research setting that another reader could recognise and verify from current university material.
Use the central pages as a map, not as a final answer. They show the range of Uppsala's research and provide tools for finding local work, but they cannot determine whether a particular group is the right setting for your next step. Mark unresolved points clearly, such as a missing method description or an unclear link between a theme and a department. Recheck those points when you update your shortlist. A concise record of confirmed evidence and remaining questions will be more useful than an overly broad description of the university.
Institution record
- Country
- Sweden
- Region
- Europe
- Status
- Public
- QS size code
- L
- Profile record updated
- July 24, 2026
This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.
Search opportunitiesOpportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.