National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (Taiwan Tech)
#345
QS World University Rankings 2026
41.7
QS 2026 overall score
Ranking data
QS World University Rankings source#345
QS World University Rankings 2026
#392
QS World University Rankings 2025
41.7
QS 2026 overall score
Indicator-level data
Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.
Academic reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 36.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #330
Employer reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 48.6
- QS 2026 rank
- #266
Faculty-student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 50.6
- QS 2026 rank
- #374
Citations per faculty
- QS 2026 score
- 46.8
- QS 2026 rank
- #405
International faculty ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 31.3
- QS 2026 rank
- #571
International student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 35.3
- QS 2026 rank
- #538
International student diversity
- QS 2026 score
- 38.9
- QS 2026 rank
- #508
International research network
- QS 2026 score
- 45.6
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
Employment outcomes
- QS 2026 score
- 25.4
- QS 2026 rank
- #632
Sustainability
- QS 2026 score
- 56.8
- QS 2026 rank
- #560
About National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (Taiwan Tech)
Taiwan Tech uses research centres to turn broad technical interests into local routes
National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, known as Taiwan Tech, makes a long list of research centres visible on its English research page. The list includes centres for wireless communication, information security, e-learning, engineering and disaster prevention, smart electric vehicles, power and energy technologies, membrane materials, net-zero processes, building technology, high-speed 3D printing, intelligent manufacturing, silicon photonics, artificial intelligence, and robots. This is useful for a reader with a specific technical question because the centres identify possible local settings without claiming that every one uses the same method, equipment, or research material.
The centre names cover several distinct forms of inquiry. A communications question may involve signals, networks, or electromagnetic compatibility. An energy question may concern devices, storage, materials, or systems. A manufacturing question can require prototypes, process data, images, or industrial design. A security question may involve software, infrastructure, or human practice. The research page gives a map, not a complete method statement for every centre. A careful comparison should therefore begin with the exact object being studied and the evidence needed to study it, then move toward the centre whose public description is closest.
Taiwan Tech research-centre pages provide a stronger next check than news
Taiwan Tech's public research highlights include a mechanism related to fast-charging batteries, mixed-reality navigation connected with hip surgery, a self-powered system for heavy-metal detection and water sterilisation, work on smart healthcare, and industry-linked testing for next-generation communications. These examples show a range of applied research objects, from electrochemical energy and medical navigation to sensing, water treatment, and communication systems. They can give a reader useful terms for a focused search. They do not establish that every centre, department, or researcher at Taiwan Tech is working on the same topics or with the same type of evidence.
The differences among the examples are important. Battery research may depend on electrochemical materials, devices, and testing. A medical-navigation question may involve imaging, clinical workflow, software, or instruments. Heavy-metal detection may require sensing, chemical analysis, environmental samples, or water-treatment methods. A news item is often a useful discovery point because it names a concrete problem. The closer research-centre, department, team, or publication page is still needed to understand the setting, method, and scope of the work. That sequence keeps the profile from treating a headline as a complete research description.
Taiwan Tech research centres differentiate technical settings and methods
For a Taiwan Tech comparison, begin with one bounded technical or social problem. It could involve a battery, a sensor, a communication signal, a manufacturing process, a building system, an image, a robot, a health device, or an educational technology. Next, list what would be needed to examine the problem: measurements, a prototype, code, images, environmental samples, laboratory data, a clinical record, field observations, or another visible source of evidence. This short record can then be compared with the research-centre map. It is a stronger starting point than selecting a centre because its title sounds familiar.
A final local check should distinguish between what the central page confirms and what it does not. The research-centres page can show that a named organisational route exists. The university's research highlights can reveal recent subjects appearing in public communication. Neither source alone confirms the current work of a particular group, the availability of a resource, or a precise research relationship. When local material identifies the object and approach, record those details plainly. When it does not, preserve the gap. This keeps a Taiwan Tech profile grounded in its visible research map while leaving room for a more precise follow-up.
Institution record
- Country
- Taiwan
- Region
- Asia
- Status
- Public
- QS size code
- M
- Profile record updated
- July 24, 2026
This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.
Search opportunitiesOpportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.