QS ranking profile
Bangor University
This page presents clearly labeled QS ranking data for orientation. It does not verify programs, supervisors, funding, admission requirements, or the university's website.
- QS 2026 rank
- #566
- Down 92 places since 2025
- QS 2025 rank
- #474
- Overall score
- 29.3
Explore opportunities at Bangor University
Browse active research positions, doctoral fellowships, and university funding calls indexed from official faculties and verified sources.
QS indicators
Reported ranking indicators
Each indicator is scored out of 100 in the same QS snapshot as the summary above.
#701 worldwide
#701 worldwide
#801 worldwide
#422 worldwide
#515 worldwide
#239 worldwide
#210 worldwide
#447 worldwide
#787 worldwide
#195 worldwide
Institution profile
How QS classifies this institution
QS groups institutions by size, subject range, and research output.
- Size
- Medium
- About 5,000 to 12,000 students
- Subject range
- Focused
- Teaches a limited range of faculty areas
- Research intensity
- Very high
- Very high research output in the QS classification
- Region
- Europe
- QS regional grouping
University profile
About Bangor University
Editorial background written for orientation. Verify programs, funding, and admission on the university's official pages.
Bangor organises research around energy and environment, health and behaviour, and language and society
Bangor University describes three broad research themes: energy and the environment; health, wellbeing and behaviour; and language, culture and society. Its public research page also separates institutes in arts, humanities and business, environmental sciences and engineering, and human sciences. This structure is useful for an initial search because it shows that a question about sustainability, health, or culture may sit in more than one setting. It does not mean those settings use the same material or method. Energy research may start with a material system, environmental measurements, infrastructure, policy, or social adoption. A health question may involve biological information, clinical practice, behaviour, care, or communication.
A research theme works best when it is reduced to a specific object. That object could be a low-carbon technology, a local ecosystem, an invasive plant, a health service, an emotional-AI system, a visual-arts practice, a Welsh-language record, or a household behaviour. Then identify what evidence would make an answer credible: samples, measurements, maps, sensor data, documents, interviews, observations, images, datasets, texts, or a controlled test. This makes the theme and institute routes useful for locating a closer research record instead of treating a large category as a complete explanation of current work.
Emotional AI, conservation, dementia care, and digital farming illustrate different Bangor research evidence
Bangor's public research material gives several detailed examples from distinct areas. Its impact material discusses emotional artificial intelligence in relation to governance, ethics, and society; conservation work that considers social effects in lower-income settings; and visual-arts interventions in dementia care. Recent research news also includes work on oil-price prediction, Welsh farmers' experience of AI and digital technology in a transition to net zero, and native insects in relation to invasive plants in Welsh woodlands. These examples should not be brought together as one generic sustainability or technology claim. Each identifies a different research object, setting, and form of evidence.
An emotional-AI question may need a system, an account of affective interaction, ethical reasoning, legal or organisational rules, and user context. A conservation question may require species or land evidence alongside community, livelihood, or policy material. Dementia-care research can involve creative practice, participant experience, care settings, health measures, and interpretation of outcomes. A farming-and-AI question may need farmer accounts, digital tools, policy context, environmental conditions, and farm records. The public examples give an informed starting vocabulary, but a close project, publication, institute, or researcher source is still needed to establish the details of any particular inquiry.
Use Bangor's institutes and impact routes to test whether a question has the right material and setting
A careful Bangor University search can start with one sentence that exposes the research problem. Name the object, the place or institution where it matters, and the records, tests, or observations needed to investigate it. For a biodiversity question, that could mean a plant or insect, a woodland, field observations, samples, and ecological records. For a health-and-behaviour question, it might be a service, participant experience, clinical information, an intervention, and carefully defined outcomes. For a language or culture question, it could be a text, community, archive, school, media practice, or public document. The university's three themes then help narrow the route toward a more local official record.
Bangor's public page establishes research themes, institute routes, impact material, partnership routes, news, and research support. It cannot show that every nearby subject is an active focus for a named team, that a headline includes the full method, or that an institutional theme automatically permits access to a resource. The right conclusion depends on the closest record that connects the proposed object to a stated activity in context. If only a relevant theme or news item appears, it can guide the next search while remaining a lead rather than a confirmed research connection. That boundary keeps the Bangor profile readable, practical, and accurate about the evidence it uses.