Skip to main content
AcademicWingsSTEM discovery
Institution profile

Cardiff University

United KingdomEurope

#181

QS World University Rankings 2026

57.8

QS 2026 overall score

QS World University Rankings data

Ranking data

QS World University Rankings source

#181

QS World University Rankings 2026

#186

QS World University Rankings 2025

57.8

QS 2026 overall score

QS 2026 indicators

Indicator-level data

Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.

Academic reputation

QS 2026 score
60.1
QS 2026 rank
#175

Employer reputation

QS 2026 score
54.4
QS 2026 rank
#223

Faculty-student ratio

QS 2026 score
48.2
QS 2026 rank
#403

Citations per faculty

QS 2026 score
42.2
QS 2026 rank
#451

International faculty ratio

QS 2026 score
87.2
QS 2026 rank
#243

International student ratio

QS 2026 score
70.1
QS 2026 rank
#278

International student diversity

QS 2026 score
73
QS 2026 rank
#248

International research network

QS 2026 score
93.4
QS 2026 rank
#120

Employment outcomes

QS 2026 score
33.5
QS 2026 rank
#502

Sustainability

QS 2026 score
88.9
QS 2026 rank
#71
University profile

About Cardiff University

Cardiff research pages link public challenges, disciplinary work, specialist facilities, and partner activity

Cardiff University presents routes for research, innovation and impact, research stories, schools, subject areas, specialist facilities, researchers, and partnerships. They are useful entry points but serve different evidential roles. A story introduces a concrete question. A school or subject route identifies an academic setting. A facility page describes a technical environment. A researcher page can link public expertise to a person. A partnership route can show an external relationship. None alone establishes the full method, materials, or scope of every project.

Cardiff's research page describes work across disciplines and with industry and government partners, while framing its public research around questions such as climate change, health inequality, technological disruption, and democratic instability. These themes give a reader useful context, but they are not interchangeable research objects. A climate question may concern food systems, a location, an environmental process, a dataset, or a public decision. A health question can concern a biological mechanism, a clinical context, an intervention, a service, or an inequality measure. A technology question may centre on a device, model, interface, infrastructure, or user practice. The next source should clarify which of those objects is actually being examined.

Climate and diet, brain imaging, neurotherapies, building materials, language, and play need distinct evidence

The public Cardiff stories make that distinction visible. One describes advanced data analysis and global food-system modelling in work on links between climate and diet. Another concerns neuroimaging and the effort to make research-grade brain investigation more accessible to scientists in lower-income settings. The research page also highlights work on gene, RNA, and cell therapies for neuro-degenerative conditions, as well as a project using Welsh wool in sustainable building design. These examples do not point to one general method. A food-system question may require model assumptions, datasets, environmental variables, and health outcomes. A neuroimaging question may involve an imaging tool, brain measure, technical protocol, and interpretation. A building-materials question can require a material, design setting, performance measure, and testing process.

Other Cardiff stories introduce research on wildlife protection, colorectal cancer vaccines, Welsh pronunciation using MRI, disinformation, and pretend play in parent-child interactions. Each has a recognisable object and setting. A wildlife question may need species information, habitat data, conservation practice, or field observations. A language question can use speech recordings, imaging, learner experience, or phonetic analysis. A disinformation question may depend on messages, platforms, documents, social context, or observed effects. A child-development question might use interactions, participant accounts, recordings, or carefully defined measures. The news stories are strong discovery cues, yet a reader should continue to the closest project, centre, researcher, or publication record before drawing a precise conclusion about research activity.

Cardiff questions become clearer after naming an object and locating an explanatory record

A focused Cardiff University search begins by turning a broad theme into a question that can be checked. Name the object, such as a food-system model, brain image, treatment approach, building material, endangered species, language sound, online message, or play interaction. Then name the setting and the material needed for investigation. Depending on the question, that may include datasets, models, images, samples, instruments, texts, maps, records, interviews, observations, or participant accounts. This preparation helps a reader choose the next public route for a reason: a facility for a technical setting, a school for an academic context, a story for an initial clue, or a research record for a specific activity.

The official Cardiff pages establish a broad research setting, public examples of work, and routes toward people, subjects, facilities, innovation, and partnerships. They do not confirm that every associated topic is active in a named unit, that a broad challenge determines a method, or that a public story provides the whole evidence base. The most reliable conclusion comes from a local official record that identifies the selected object and gives enough detail about the research context. When only a related theme is visible, it remains a useful direction for later review rather than proof of a particular research match. This keeps the Cardiff University profile practical and faithful to the level of detail available in the public evidence.

Institution record

Country
United Kingdom
Region
Europe
Status
Public
QS size code
L
Profile record updated
July 24, 2026

This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.

Search opportunities

Opportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.