QS ranking profile
De Montfort University
This page presents clearly labeled QS ranking data for orientation. It does not verify programs, supervisors, funding, admission requirements, or the university's website.
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
- Down 90 places since 2025
- QS 2025 rank
- #711
- Overall score
- Not published
Explore opportunities at De Montfort University
Browse active research positions, doctoral fellowships, and university funding calls indexed from official faculties and verified sources.
QS indicators
Reported ranking indicators
Each indicator is scored out of 100 in the same QS snapshot as the summary above.
#701 worldwide
#701 worldwide
#801 worldwide
#770 worldwide
#284 worldwide
#107 worldwide
#92 worldwide
#734 worldwide
#801 worldwide
#409 worldwide
Institution profile
How QS classifies this institution
QS groups institutions by size, subject range, and research output.
- Size
- Large
- About 12,000 to 30,000 students
- Subject range
- Full comprehensive
- All main faculty areas, including a medical school
- Research intensity
- Very high
- Very high research output in the QS classification
- Region
- Europe
- QS regional grouping
University profile
About De Montfort University
Editorial background written for orientation. Verify programs, funding, and admission on the university's official pages.
De Montfort University connects research with health, infrastructure, creativity, business, and civil society
De Montfort University presents research as central to its mission and describes work that addresses health and wellbeing, infrastructure, creativity, economic growth, business, and civil society. These areas can be related through a public challenge, yet they begin with different things to investigate. A health question may focus on a medicine, device, patient pathway, service, exposure, or experience. An infrastructure question can involve a system, material, building, transport route, or public-use pattern. A creative question may work with a performance, image, text, design, audience, or cultural record. A business question can centre on an organisation, practice, decision, supply route, or measure of change.
The university's research statement gives these questions a common concern with public consequence, but that concern is not a method. A project needs to decide what kind of record can reveal the process it studies. It may use measurements, policy documents, interviews, observation, prototypes, media material, health data, or a comparison between cases. The right material depends on whether the project is explaining a technical mechanism, a social practice, a cultural meaning, or an institutional decision. De Montfort's research setting becomes more useful when that distinction is made early, before a broad problem is described as interdisciplinary.
Digital futures, responsible business, sustainable futures, arts, health, and social sciences give DMU distinct routes
De Montfort University identifies Research and Innovation Institutes focused on digital futures, responsible business and social justice, sustainable futures, arts design and performance, global challenges and cultures, pharmaceutical and health innovation, and social sciences. Each route suggests a different type of research material. Digital work may involve artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, data, media, or a creative technology. Responsible-business work can address an organisation, rule, economic decision, inequality, or legal setting. Sustainable-futures questions may concern environmental conditions, systems, communication, or public choices. Arts and performance research can work through making, documentation, history, practice, and audience response. Health research may focus on molecules, products, services, or care practices.
A DMU enquiry becomes more precise when it chooses one of these materials before it chooses an institute. A question about artificial intelligence can identify a model, dataset, interface, decision, or consequence. A sustainability question may be about transport, packaging, purchasing, inventory, or a different operational process. A question about social justice can name the group, institution, policy, or unequal experience under study. This method of definition does not prevent a connection between institutes. It makes the connection credible by showing what each field contributes to a shared, observable problem.
Logistics, women in technology, creative inquiry, and knife safety show varied DMU research needs
Recent De Montfort research activity includes a green-logistics dashboard for manufacturers, work on women in technology and public policy, a Creative Knowing symposium, and research on safer knife design. These items are useful because they show how different public concerns require different records. A logistics project can examine transport, packaging, purchasing, inventory, and reverse flows. A question about women in technology may investigate access, institutional practice, policy, work experience, or representation. A creative-inquiry project can use participatory practice, artefacts, discussion, reflection, and collaboration. Knife-safety research may turn on object design, handling, injury risk, testing, and public communication.
A practical DMU project would take one of these contexts and make the uncertainty explicit. It could ask how a change in a supply practice affects a defined environmental measure, how a policy shapes participation in a technical field, how a participatory process changes a creative outcome, or how a design alters a safety condition. The next step is to decide what could falsify an easy answer. With this in view, a dashboard, interview, document, prototype, observation, or dataset becomes material for a particular claim rather than a decorative feature of the project. The university's institutes can then provide a suitable intellectual and practical home for that work.