Skip to main content
AcademicWings STEM discovery

QS ranking profile

Goldsmiths, University of London

United Kingdom Public

This page presents clearly labeled QS ranking data for orientation. It does not verify programs, supervisors, funding, admission requirements, or the university's website.

QS 2026 rank
#711
Down 30 places since 2025
QS 2025 rank
#681
Overall score
Not published
Verified Catalog STEM PhDs, Postdocs & Fellowships

Explore opportunities at Goldsmiths, University of London

Browse active research positions, doctoral fellowships, and university funding calls indexed from official faculties and verified sources.

QS indicators

Reported ranking indicators

Each indicator is scored out of 100 in the same QS snapshot as the summary above.

Academic reputation 18.3

#668 worldwide

Employer reputation 7.5

#701 worldwide

Faculty-student ratio 20.8

#801 worldwide

Citations per faculty 17

#765 worldwide

International faculty ratio 89.1

#230 worldwide

International student ratio 97.8

#93 worldwide

International student diversity 97.9

#82 worldwide

International research network 22.7

#801 worldwide

Employment outcomes 25.2

#637 worldwide

Sustainability 43

#801 worldwide

Institution profile

How QS classifies this institution

QS groups institutions by size, subject range, and research output.

Size
Medium
About 5,000 to 12,000 students
Subject range
Full comprehensive
All main faculty areas, including a medical school
Research intensity
Very high
Very high research output in the QS classification
Region
Europe
QS regional grouping

University profile

About Goldsmiths, University of London

Editorial background written for orientation. Verify programs, funding, and admission on the university's official pages.

Goldsmiths, University of London, joins creative work with social research

Goldsmiths, University of London, describes research across anthropology, art, computing, design, educational studies, English and creative writing, history, creative and cultural entrepreneurship, management, law, media and communications, music, politics and international relations, psychology, social and community studies, sociology, theatre, performance, and visual cultures. This range helps an applicant connect a question about people, technology, culture, or institutions to a department, but the method and evidence should decide the academic home.

The university's research-degree pages cover arts and humanities, computing, creative industries, and social sciences. A project may be practice-based, textual, computational, experimental, or field-based. London can also be part of the research setting for work on urban communities, cultural organisations, media, public services, or social change. The department and research-group page should explain the route, language, supervision, and expected result.

Goldsmiths research centres explore digital culture, art, justice, and communities

Goldsmiths organises research through centres and smaller units that bring colleagues together across departments. The public list includes the Asia Centre, Centre for Art and Ecology, Centre for Arts and Learning, Centre of the Body, Goldsmiths Writers' Centre, Digital Culture Unit, Forensic Psychology Unit, Unit for Global Justice, Structural Economic Analysis Unit, and music, design, play, school, and family research units. These names indicate possible routes into interdisciplinary work, but they do not replace a named project or supervisor.

A digital-culture study might examine how computing changes work, art, or everyday life. Forensic psychology needs a justice setting and behavioural evidence. Art and ecology may combine practice, environmental observation, and community participation. Structural economics requires a system, sector, or distributional measure. The research strategy also emphasises public engagement, so an applicant should describe who will use the result and how that use relates to the method.

How to assess a Goldsmiths, University of London route

Define the object before choosing a department. Computing needs code, data, a system, or an interaction. Psychology and sociology require participants, observed conduct, an organisation, or a social setting. Arts and performance need a practice, work, audience, or process. History and writing should identify a text, archive, language, or historical record. Management and law require an organisation, rule, policy, or decision.

A Goldsmiths shortlist entry should name the department and question first. Include the study language, intended result, method, and an active research-degree or researcher page. Treat a centre or unit as a bridge to people and themes, not as confirmation of an open project. Classify the work as creative, textual, computational, experimental, field-based, organisational, or policy-focused. List the studio, archive, dataset, participant group, community, or partner required by the proposed design before judging how the route fits your preparation.

Goldsmiths is a good fit for projects where the form of the work matters as much as its subject. A performance, interface, film, map, archive, or community workshop can be part of the evidence, but the proposal should explain how it will be made, observed, interpreted, or evaluated. Writing that sequence beside the department name helps separate a practice-led plan from a conventional social or computational study and makes the intended contribution easier to discuss. A short note on the audience or setting also shows why the university's creative and social research mix matters to the plan.