Skip to main content
AcademicWingsSTEM discovery
Institution profile

Loughborough University

United KingdomEurope

#225

QS World University Rankings 2026

53.3

QS 2026 overall score

QS World University Rankings data

Ranking data

QS World University Rankings source

#225

QS World University Rankings 2026

#224

QS World University Rankings 2025

53.3

QS 2026 overall score

QS 2026 indicators

Indicator-level data

Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.

Academic reputation

QS 2026 score
42.8
QS 2026 rank
#277

Employer reputation

QS 2026 score
64.5
QS 2026 rank
#165

Faculty-student ratio

QS 2026 score
26.9
QS 2026 rank
#699

Citations per faculty

QS 2026 score
50.6
QS 2026 rank
#371

International faculty ratio

QS 2026 score
94.6
QS 2026 rank
#183

International student ratio

QS 2026 score
71.1
QS 2026 rank
#269

International student diversity

QS 2026 score
73.9
QS 2026 rank
#242

International research network

QS 2026 score
81.4
QS 2026 rank
#324

Employment outcomes

QS 2026 score
33.2
QS 2026 rank
#509

Sustainability

QS 2026 score
87.9
QS 2026 rank
#80
University profile

About Loughborough University

Several search routes reveal different parts of Loughborough research

Loughborough University invites readers to explore research by topic, academic school, established strength, and interdisciplinary challenge. Each route answers a different question. A topic can identify vocabulary, an academic school can show a disciplinary base, an established strength can suggest a wider area of activity, and an interdisciplinary challenge can show where several perspectives meet. Do not assume those routes are interchangeable. A search becomes clearer when you decide whether your question is primarily about a field, a method, a practical problem, or a combination of these elements.

The research page also directs readers toward schools and departments, centres of excellence, and research clusters. This creates a useful sequence for close reading. A school may show the underlying discipline, a centre may gather expertise around a specialised subject, and a cluster may connect people around a complex issue. Read the smallest relevant setting before drawing a conclusion from a central label. The local page should make clear what researchers are studying and how they frame the work. When it merely echoes a broad theme, keep it as an early pointer instead of a verified connection.

Clusters, repositories, and public engagement play distinct roles

Loughborough describes cross-disciplinary research clusters designed around complex global issues and links them to the university's stated strengths. This is helpful context for a question that cannot be contained in one subject. It is still important to ask what is being combined in practice. The overlap might concern design, data, engineering, behaviour, policy, or another form of inquiry. A cluster title alone does not answer that question. Find the researchers, projects, or centres that turn the general issue into a visible research problem and then compare their approach with your own interests.

The public research structure also includes a repository, research integrity material, and public engagement. These pages can support a careful search in different ways. A repository may help identify research outputs and terms used in a field, integrity material gives context about institutional standards, and public engagement can show how work is discussed beyond the university. None replaces a local research description. Use them to sharpen your questions, then return to the academic school, centre, or group where the relevant work is described in enough detail to be evaluated.

Frame a Loughborough note around evidence that can be revisited

A focused Loughborough University note starts with a precise research object. It may be a system, material, population, design problem, or environmental process. Choose the search route that best fits that object, then identify the nearest school, centre, or cluster. Add a second piece of local evidence that shows the method or perspective being used. This might be a project description, a researcher profile, or a current publication record. The goal is not to prove that every related theme belongs together. It is to show why one concrete setting deserves more attention.

Keep the final comparison bounded by the public evidence. State what the official pages establish about the unit and what still requires a closer check. This is especially helpful where a topic appears in both a disciplinary school and an interdisciplinary cluster. The overlap may be useful, but its form needs to be visible. A note that names the local setting, research object, and approach can be updated when new material appears, while a broad statement about institutional scope is much harder to test or correct.

Institution record

Country
United Kingdom
Region
Europe
Status
Public
QS size code
L
Profile record updated
July 24, 2026

This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.

Search opportunities

Opportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.