Nottingham Trent University
#609
QS World University Rankings 2026
27.9
QS 2026 overall score
Ranking data
QS World University Rankings source#609
QS World University Rankings 2026
#592
QS World University Rankings 2025
27.9
QS 2026 overall score
Indicator-level data
Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.
Academic reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 16.4
- QS 2026 rank
- #701
Employer reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 22.9
- QS 2026 rank
- #580
Faculty-student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 15.5
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
Citations per faculty
- QS 2026 score
- 10.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
International faculty ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 67.1
- QS 2026 rank
- #349
International student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 90.4
- QS 2026 rank
- #165
International student diversity
- QS 2026 score
- 91.2
- QS 2026 rank
- #140
International research network
- QS 2026 score
- 84.8
- QS 2026 rank
- #258
Employment outcomes
- QS 2026 score
- 20.4
- QS 2026 rank
- #717
Sustainability
- QS 2026 score
- 77.5
- QS 2026 rank
- #206
About Nottingham Trent University
Nottingham Trent University presents research as shared practice across people, schools, partners, and public questions
Nottingham Trent University describes research through courage, creativity, and collaboration, while placing people at the centre of that work. Its Re:searchers Re:vealed series introduces researchers from varied backgrounds, including dancers, engineers, refugees, survivors, mothers, and volunteers. This is a useful reminder that a university research environment is not simply a list of subjects. A question can be shaped by professional practice, lived experience, a community relationship, or a technical discipline.
The university's research page also frames inquiry as work that can involve colleagues, students, businesses, and community partners. That wide frame can help someone think beyond a single department, especially when a question crosses social, technical, cultural, or environmental boundaries. Yet collaboration can take many forms. A business-related question may involve an organisation, product, process, workforce, or regulation. A community question may centre on local knowledge, public services, place, or participation. A technical question may require a device, material, system, measurement, or model. Clarifying the object first helps a reader decide whether the next step should be a research centre, project, school, researcher, or case study.
NTU research themes, centres, projects, and impact cases provide different routes into a specific line of inquiry
Nottingham Trent University groups work through strategic research themes and specialist research centres that span its academic schools. It also provides routes to research groups, projects, and impact case studies. Each route answers a different kind of question. A theme can show a large area of attention. A centre can show an enduring group of specialists. A project may identify a narrower question, setting, and time frame. An impact case can explain how a piece of work relates to a change beyond the university. The right choice depends on the question being asked. Someone with an early interest in a subject may begin with a theme or centre; someone seeking a precise match should look for a project, researcher, or detailed case.
The current research stories show why that distinction matters. They include discussion of resilience in war, political memes, changes to prison sentences, and work intended to strengthen water vole recovery in England. These topics do not share one method. Research on war and resilience might examine narratives, organisations, communities, or mental health. Political-meme work could involve images, platforms, messages, audiences, or electoral context. A sentencing question may require legislation, institutions, case records, or policy analysis. Wildlife recovery can involve species, habitat, monitoring, and conservation practice. A story title can open the door to an issue, but the closest project or researcher record is needed to understand the actual question and its boundaries.
Nottingham Trent research questions benefit from a named project, researcher, and defined setting
A practical Nottingham Trent University search begins by turning a large theme into a smaller question. Instead of starting with “war”, name a population, experience, institution, or public narrative. Instead of starting with “political memes”, identify a platform, visual pattern, time period, audience, or event. Instead of starting with “wildlife”, name a species, habitat, intervention, or monitoring practice. The same discipline applies to business and industry questions. Name the organisation, activity, technology, decision, or outcome that needs to be understood. This creates a useful bridge from a general theme to a research centre, project page, staff member, or case study with enough detail to guide the next conversation.
NTU's research pages make people, partnerships, strategic themes, centres, groups, projects, and public questions visible in one place. Their value is in showing possible directions, not in making every direction identical. A topic becomes more credible when a reader can say what is being studied, who is connected to it, where the work sits, and what form the material takes. It may be a policy text, an interview, a biological observation, a digital image, an organisational record, a technical measurement, or a set of public documents. That level of clarity helps a reader approach Nottingham Trent University with a question that is open enough for collaboration but specific enough to investigate responsibly.
Institution record
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Region
- Europe
- Status
- Public
- QS size code
- XL
- Profile record updated
- July 24, 2026
This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.
Search opportunitiesOpportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.