Skip to main content
AcademicWings STEM discovery

QS ranking profile

Nottingham Trent University

United Kingdom Public

This page presents clearly labeled QS ranking data for orientation. It does not verify programs, supervisors, funding, admission requirements, or the university's website.

QS 2026 rank
#609
Down 17 places since 2025
QS 2025 rank
#592
Overall score
27.9
Verified Catalog STEM PhDs, Postdocs & Fellowships

Explore opportunities at Nottingham Trent University

Browse active research positions, doctoral fellowships, and university funding calls indexed from official faculties and verified sources.

QS indicators

Reported ranking indicators

Each indicator is scored out of 100 in the same QS snapshot as the summary above.

Academic reputation 16.4

#701 worldwide

Employer reputation 22.9

#580 worldwide

Faculty-student ratio 15.5

#801 worldwide

Citations per faculty 10.7

#801 worldwide

International faculty ratio 67.1

#349 worldwide

International student ratio 90.4

#165 worldwide

International student diversity 91.2

#140 worldwide

International research network 84.8

#258 worldwide

Employment outcomes 20.4

#717 worldwide

Sustainability 77.5

#206 worldwide

Institution profile

How QS classifies this institution

QS groups institutions by size, subject range, and research output.

Size
Extra large
More than 30,000 students
Subject range
Comprehensive
Teaches across all main faculty areas
Research intensity
Very high
Very high research output in the QS classification
Region
Europe
QS regional grouping

University profile

About Nottingham Trent University

Editorial background written for orientation. Verify programs, funding, and admission on the university's official pages.

Nottingham Trent University presents research as shared practice across people, schools, partners, and public questions

Nottingham Trent University describes research through courage, creativity, and collaboration, while placing people at the centre of that work. Its Re:searchers Re:vealed series introduces researchers from varied backgrounds, including dancers, engineers, refugees, survivors, mothers, and volunteers. This is a useful reminder that a university research environment is not simply a list of subjects. A question can be shaped by professional practice, lived experience, a community relationship, or a technical discipline.

The university's research page also frames inquiry as work that can involve colleagues, students, businesses, and community partners. That wide frame can help someone think beyond a single department, especially when a question crosses social, technical, cultural, or environmental boundaries. Yet collaboration can take many forms. A business-related question may involve an organisation, product, process, workforce, or regulation. A community question may centre on local knowledge, public services, place, or participation. A technical question may require a device, material, system, measurement, or model. Clarifying the object first helps a reader decide whether the next step should be a research centre, project, school, researcher, or case study.

NTU research themes, centres, projects, and impact cases provide different routes into a specific line of inquiry

Nottingham Trent University groups work through strategic research themes and specialist research centres that span its academic schools. It also provides routes to research groups, projects, and impact case studies. Each route answers a different kind of question. A theme can show a large area of attention. A centre can show an enduring group of specialists. A project may identify a narrower question, setting, and time frame. An impact case can explain how a piece of work relates to a change beyond the university. The right choice depends on the question being asked. Someone with an early interest in a subject may begin with a theme or centre; someone seeking a precise match should look for a project, researcher, or detailed case.

The current research stories show why that distinction matters. They include discussion of resilience in war, political memes, changes to prison sentences, and work intended to strengthen water vole recovery in England. These topics do not share one method. Research on war and resilience might examine narratives, organisations, communities, or mental health. Political-meme work could involve images, platforms, messages, audiences, or electoral context. A sentencing question may require legislation, institutions, case records, or policy analysis. Wildlife recovery can involve species, habitat, monitoring, and conservation practice. A story title can open the door to an issue, but the closest project or researcher record is needed to understand the actual question and its boundaries.

Nottingham Trent research questions benefit from a named project, researcher, and defined setting

A practical Nottingham Trent University search begins by turning a large theme into a smaller question. Instead of starting with “war”, name a population, experience, institution, or public narrative. Instead of starting with “political memes”, identify a platform, visual pattern, time period, audience, or event. Instead of starting with “wildlife”, name a species, habitat, intervention, or monitoring practice. The same discipline applies to business and industry questions. Name the organisation, activity, technology, decision, or outcome that needs to be understood. This creates a useful bridge from a general theme to a research centre, project page, staff member, or case study with enough detail to guide the next conversation.

NTU's research pages make people, partnerships, strategic themes, centres, groups, projects, and public questions visible in one place. Their value is in showing possible directions, not in making every direction identical. A topic becomes more credible when a reader can say what is being studied, who is connected to it, where the work sits, and what form the material takes. It may be a policy text, an interview, a biological observation, a digital image, an organisational record, a technical measurement, or a set of public documents. That level of clarity helps a reader approach Nottingham Trent University with a question that is open enough for collaboration but specific enough to investigate responsibly.