The University of Nottingham
#97
QS World University Rankings 2026
69.4
QS 2026 overall score
Ranking data
QS World University Rankings source#97
QS World University Rankings 2026
#108
QS World University Rankings 2025
69.4
QS 2026 overall score
Indicator-level data
Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.
Academic reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 75.4
- QS 2026 rank
- #110
Employer reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 78.4
- QS 2026 rank
- #110
Faculty-student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 44.5
- QS 2026 rank
- #444
Citations per faculty
- QS 2026 score
- 48.6
- QS 2026 rank
- #382
International faculty ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 92.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #202
International student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 78.5
- QS 2026 rank
- #231
International student diversity
- QS 2026 score
- 80.6
- QS 2026 rank
- #201
International research network
- QS 2026 score
- 97.4
- QS 2026 rank
- #30
Employment outcomes
- QS 2026 score
- 53.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #313
Sustainability
- QS 2026 score
- 92.9
- QS 2026 rank
- #36
About The University of Nottingham
Nottingham connects research areas with institutes and people
The University of Nottingham presents research through faculties, schools or departments, research centres and institutes, facilities, resources, and an option to find an academic. This structure is useful because it gives a subject several possible entry points without suggesting that every question belongs to the same level. A department may provide the disciplinary home, while an institute or facility may show a more specific setting for collaboration or equipment. Begin with the unit closest to the research problem and use the wider structure only to understand what surrounds it. That prevents a broad university label from doing too much analytical work.
Nottingham's research pages also point to interdisciplinary activity, digital research, partnerships, and an institute for policy and engagement. These routes can be helpful when a question crosses a technical, scientific, social, or public boundary. They should not replace local evidence. Look for the researchers, current projects, or group descriptions that explain what is actually being studied. A clean comparison identifies a problem, a setting, and an approach. It does not assume that the existence of an interdisciplinary page means a particular laboratory or supervisor will work on every version of that problem.
Flagship institutes point to distinct problem spaces
The University of Nottingham's interdisciplinary material names the Biodiscovery Institute, Energy Institute, Institute for Aerospace Technology, and Food Systems Institute. Each title points toward a different problem space and should be read in its own terms. Biodiscovery is not interchangeable with health research generally; aerospace technology is not the same as every engineering topic; food systems can include questions that are scientific, social, or environmental. Use the institute name to refine a search, then follow the trail to the local research group or academic whose current material makes the methods and objects of study visible.
The same page describes five interdisciplinary Global Research Themes and explains that collaboration can draw together strengths from different subject areas. That is valuable context for a question that cannot be handled through one discipline alone. It remains important to ask what is combined in practice: datasets, experiments, modelling, engineering design, community work, or policy analysis. An interdisciplinary title is a route into the evidence, not the evidence itself. Keep a notebook entry narrow enough to show which part of the theme connects with your own research direction and which parts are only possible leads.
The National Rehabilitation Centre illustrates a partnership route
Nottingham's interdisciplinary page describes the National Rehabilitation Centre as a partnership involving Nottingham University Hospitals Trust and Loughborough University. It says that research, innovation, education, and training are intended to be integrated with clinical practice around life-changing injury, trauma, and illness. This is a useful illustration of how a research environment can be organised around a practical setting as well as an academic subject. For a related question, examine the precise role of the relevant group, the clinical or technical problem involved, and the evidence that the methods connect with your own preparation.
A Nottingham profile is most useful when it records the closest unit rather than treating the whole research landscape as one answer. Name the department, institute, partnership, or academic that gives the question an identifiable home. Then add a second local piece of evidence, such as a project description or research area. If that evidence does not yet show a clear methodological link, leave the note provisional. The university-wide research map can suggest routes, but a defensible comparison depends on the small setting where people, questions, and methods come together.
Institution record
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Region
- Europe
- Status
- Public
- QS size code
- XL
- Profile record updated
- July 24, 2026
This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.
Search opportunitiesOpportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.