Skip to main content
AcademicWings STEM discovery

QS ranking profile

The University of Nottingham

United Kingdom Public

This page presents clearly labeled QS ranking data for orientation. It does not verify programs, supervisors, funding, admission requirements, or the university's website.

QS 2026 rank
#97
Up 11 places since 2025
QS 2025 rank
#108
Overall score
69.4
Verified Catalog STEM PhDs, Postdocs & Fellowships

Explore opportunities at The University of Nottingham

Browse active research positions, doctoral fellowships, and university funding calls indexed from official faculties and verified sources.

QS indicators

Reported ranking indicators

Each indicator is scored out of 100 in the same QS snapshot as the summary above.

Academic reputation 75.4

#110 worldwide

Employer reputation 78.4

#110 worldwide

Faculty-student ratio 44.5

#444 worldwide

Citations per faculty 48.6

#382 worldwide

International faculty ratio 92.7

#202 worldwide

International student ratio 78.5

#231 worldwide

International student diversity 80.6

#201 worldwide

International research network 97.4

#30 worldwide

Employment outcomes 53.7

#313 worldwide

Sustainability 92.9

#36 worldwide

Institution profile

How QS classifies this institution

QS groups institutions by size, subject range, and research output.

Size
Extra large
More than 30,000 students
Subject range
Focused
Teaches a limited range of faculty areas
Research intensity
Very high
Very high research output in the QS classification
Region
Europe
QS regional grouping

University profile

About The University of Nottingham

Editorial background written for orientation. Verify programs, funding, and admission on the university's official pages.

Nottingham connects research areas with institutes and people

The University of Nottingham presents research through faculties, schools or departments, research centres and institutes, facilities, resources, and an option to find an academic. This structure is useful because it gives a subject several possible entry points without suggesting that every question belongs to the same level. A department may provide the disciplinary home, while an institute or facility may show a more specific setting for collaboration or equipment. Begin with the unit closest to the research problem and use the wider structure only to understand what surrounds it. That prevents a broad university label from doing too much analytical work.

Nottingham's research pages also point to interdisciplinary activity, digital research, partnerships, and an institute for policy and engagement. These routes can be helpful when a question crosses a technical, scientific, social, or public boundary. They should not replace local evidence. Look for the researchers, current projects, or group descriptions that explain what is actually being studied. A clean comparison identifies a problem, a setting, and an approach. It does not assume that the existence of an interdisciplinary page means a particular laboratory or supervisor will work on every version of that problem.

Flagship institutes point to distinct problem spaces

The University of Nottingham's interdisciplinary material names the Biodiscovery Institute, Energy Institute, Institute for Aerospace Technology, and Food Systems Institute. Each title points toward a different problem space and should be read in its own terms. Biodiscovery is not interchangeable with health research generally; aerospace technology is not the same as every engineering topic; food systems can include questions that are scientific, social, or environmental. Use the institute name to refine a search, then follow the trail to the local research group or academic whose current material makes the methods and objects of study visible.

The same page describes five interdisciplinary Global Research Themes and explains that collaboration can draw together strengths from different subject areas. That is valuable context for a question that cannot be handled through one discipline alone. It remains important to ask what is combined in practice: datasets, experiments, modelling, engineering design, community work, or policy analysis. An interdisciplinary title is a route into the evidence, not the evidence itself. Keep a notebook entry narrow enough to show which part of the theme connects with your own research direction and which parts are only possible leads.

The National Rehabilitation Centre illustrates a partnership route

Nottingham's interdisciplinary page describes the National Rehabilitation Centre as a partnership involving Nottingham University Hospitals Trust and Loughborough University. It says that research, innovation, education, and training are intended to be integrated with clinical practice around life-changing injury, trauma, and illness. This is a useful illustration of how a research environment can be organised around a practical setting as well as an academic subject. For a related question, examine the precise role of the relevant group, the clinical or technical problem involved, and the evidence that the methods connect with your own preparation.

A Nottingham profile is most useful when it records the closest unit rather than treating the whole research landscape as one answer. Name the department, institute, partnership, or academic that gives the question an identifiable home. Then add a second local piece of evidence, such as a project description or research area. If that evidence does not yet show a clear methodological link, leave the note provisional. The university-wide research map can suggest routes, but a defensible comparison depends on the small setting where people, questions, and methods come together.