QS ranking profile
University of Bath
This page presents clearly labeled QS ranking data for orientation. It does not verify programs, supervisors, funding, admission requirements, or the university's website.
- QS 2026 rank
- #132
- Up 18 places since 2025
- QS 2025 rank
- #150
- Overall score
- 64.2
Explore opportunities at University of Bath
Browse active research positions, doctoral fellowships, and university funding calls indexed from official faculties and verified sources.
QS indicators
Reported ranking indicators
Each indicator is scored out of 100 in the same QS snapshot as the summary above.
#233 worldwide
#100 worldwide
#801 worldwide
#173 worldwide
#170 worldwide
#187 worldwide
#156 worldwide
#250 worldwide
#337 worldwide
#127 worldwide
Institution profile
How QS classifies this institution
QS groups institutions by size, subject range, and research output.
- Size
- Large
- About 12,000 to 30,000 students
- Subject range
- Comprehensive
- Teaches across all main faculty areas
- Research intensity
- Very high
- Very high research output in the QS classification
- Region
- Europe
- QS regional grouping
University profile
About University of Bath
Editorial background written for orientation. Verify programs, funding, and admission on the university's official pages.
Research themes give a first view of the Bath environment
University of Bath received its Royal Charter in 1966 and identifies its main campus at Claverton Down on the east side of Bath. Its public research information is organised around three broad themes: sustainability, health and wellbeing, and digital. These themes can help a prospective researcher locate the language used across the institution, particularly when a question combines disciplines. They are not programme descriptions. A broad theme may include work from several departments, institutes, centres, or research groups, each with a different approach. Start with the theme as orientation, then find the academic unit where the work you care about is currently described.
The university also presents Bath Beacons as multidisciplinary structures that bring researchers together around major challenges. This can be useful context for someone exploring a question that does not sit neatly in one field. It still needs a clear disciplinary anchor. Find out which department, school, or research group would provide the academic setting, then use a Beacon or other cross-disciplinary material to understand the wider connections. This keeps a shortlist note realistic: it recognises broader collaboration without losing sight of the unit that would shape the day-to-day research work.
Institutes, centres, and research practice add useful detail
Bath's research pages point to research institutes, centres and groups, research culture, integrity, ethics, and news about current work. These pages can help you move from a broad subject to a visible research setting. An institute may make the wider problem clear, while a centre or group page is more likely to reveal the people, methods, and projects involved. Read them together when possible. A good research fit depends on more than finding a topic word on a university page; it depends on understanding how that topic is being studied in the part of the institution you are considering.
The public material also makes research integrity and ethics visible as part of the research environment. For an applicant, this is a prompt to examine research practice with care. If your planned work might involve people, data, laboratories, experiments, or a partner organisation, look for the guidance and local context that are relevant to the actual field. Do not assume that every group works in the same way simply because a university-wide policy exists. The clearest evidence will connect the research question, the named unit, and the current methods or projects it presents.
Develop a University of Bath shortlist with clear evidence
For each University of Bath option, keep a short record that names the academic route, the department or group, and the research theme or institute that helped you discover it. Then explain what makes the link meaningful for you. This could be a method from earlier study, a technical skill, a data source, a field problem, a laboratory approach, or a research question you want to develop. If the record only says that the university works on sustainability, health, or digital topics, it is not yet specific enough to guide a serious comparison.
Check the current pages maintained by the closest academic unit before you take the next step. Institutional themes and central research information give important context, but a particular research path will be defined by the programme, department, or group involved. The QS panel above reports an institution-wide comparison and is not a judgement about every subject or project at University of Bath. Keep the final decision tied to the current evidence that connects your question to an identifiable academic home.