University of Birmingham
#76
QS World University Rankings 2026
73.8
QS 2026 overall score
Ranking data
QS World University Rankings source#76
QS World University Rankings 2026
#80
QS World University Rankings 2025
73.8
QS 2026 overall score
Indicator-level data
Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.
Academic reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 81.1
- QS 2026 rank
- #95
Employer reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 75.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #122
Faculty-student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 49.9
- QS 2026 rank
- #385
Citations per faculty
- QS 2026 score
- 56.1
- QS 2026 rank
- #316
International faculty ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 96.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #154
International student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 93.4
- QS 2026 rank
- #139
International student diversity
- QS 2026 score
- 93.9
- QS 2026 rank
- #115
International research network
- QS 2026 score
- 96.3
- QS 2026 rank
- #54
Employment outcomes
- QS 2026 score
- 54.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #305
Sustainability
- QS 2026 score
- 92.8
- QS 2026 rank
- #38
About University of Birmingham
A research structure that can be inspected by unit
The University of Birmingham's research portal makes the institutional structure visible through colleges, schools, departments, profiles, projects, activities, data, equipment, and research units. The central listing includes Arts and Law, Engineering and Physical Sciences, Life and Environmental Sciences, Medicine and Health, and Social Sciences. This is a useful starting map for a question that may sit near more than one area. It lets you distinguish between a university-wide theme and the academic unit where the related work is actually organised. The most useful comparison starts by locating the unit that owns the core method or discipline.
The portal also brings together public records of people and research activity. That makes it possible to move from a topic word to a researcher profile, a project, a unit, or a publication trail. A broad interest in environmental systems, health, computing, materials, policy, or culture should therefore be treated as a search starting point, not as a finished conclusion. Read the pages attached to the relevant school or department and ask what kind of evidence, technical work, or conceptual approach is being used. The answer will be more meaningful than a claim based only on the university's overall subject range.
Challenge themes and current research records
Birmingham presents its research through challenge themes as well as disciplinary units. That can be helpful for problems that need more than one field, such as a health question with a data component or an engineering question with environmental consequences. Yet challenge themes do not replace local academic detail. They should lead you toward the people, centres, and units that carry out the work. When you find a promising theme, look for evidence that explains the current problem being investigated, the methods being used, and the part of the university responsible for it.
The research portal's mix of profiles, projects, research units, activities, and equipment is especially useful for building a compact evidence trail. Begin with a specific phrase related to your question. Notice which names or units recur across several records. Then compare those records with your own preparation and the direction you want to develop. A recurring connection may indicate a real local setting; one isolated keyword may not. This simple distinction helps prevent a broad university overview from being mistaken for evidence that a particular research path is already available.
A practical University of Birmingham comparison
Write a University of Birmingham note in three parts: the question you want to investigate, the local academic setting that appears to address it, and the methodological connection between the two. The setting may be a department, school, centre, or research unit. The methodological connection might involve experimentation, computation, clinical work, archival study, field research, or a combination of approaches. Keep the statement concrete enough that another reader could check it against the current public record. If you cannot name the local setting, keep searching before treating the option as a close match.
Use the central pages to understand the scale of the research environment, but do not ask them to answer questions they cannot answer. They do not define an individual supervisor relationship or a particular project's status. Those details should remain open until current local evidence makes them clear. A well-kept comparison note separates confirmed observations from unanswered questions and records the exact pages or units you need to revisit. That discipline makes it easier to compare Birmingham with other institutions without falling back on general statements that are difficult to verify.
Institution record
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Region
- Europe
- Status
- Public
- QS size code
- XL
- Profile record updated
- July 24, 2026
This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.
Search opportunitiesOpportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.