Skip to main content
AcademicWingsSTEM discovery
Institution profile

University of Brighton

United KingdomEurope

#801

QS World University Rankings 2026

Not listed

QS 2026 overall score

QS World University Rankings data

Ranking data

QS World University Rankings source

#801

QS World University Rankings 2026

#801

QS World University Rankings 2025

Not listed

QS 2026 overall score

QS 2026 indicators

Indicator-level data

Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.

Academic reputation

QS 2026 score
9.6
QS 2026 rank
#701

Employer reputation

QS 2026 score
9.7
QS 2026 rank
#701

Faculty-student ratio

QS 2026 score
12.4
QS 2026 rank
#801

Citations per faculty

QS 2026 score
24.9
QS 2026 rank
#642

International faculty ratio

QS 2026 score
64.9
QS 2026 rank
#359

International student ratio

QS 2026 score
68.1
QS 2026 rank
#289

International student diversity

QS 2026 score
71.2
QS 2026 rank
#260

International research network

QS 2026 score
73.1
QS 2026 rank
#486

Employment outcomes

QS 2026 score
11.5
QS 2026 rank
#801

Sustainability

QS 2026 score
39.1
QS 2026 rank
#801
University profile

About University of Brighton

University of Brighton links research, knowledge exchange, and community partnerships around practical questions

The University of Brighton places research and knowledge exchange side by side. Its public research area names Centres of Research and Knowledge Exchange Excellence, Research Excellence Groups, a research database, and the Community University Partnership Programme. That combination suggests that a research question may have a different route depending on what it is trying to understand and who is involved. A health question can centre on a diagnostic tool, a biological signal, a care process, or an unequal outcome. A community question may begin with a local organisation, shared concern, policy, or practice. A technical question can require a material, design, measurement, or test environment. The first task is to decide which of those elements is the actual object of study.

Knowledge exchange is most useful when it follows a well-defined question rather than replacing one. A project involving a community or workplace still needs a stated problem, an appropriate method, and a clear account of the evidence that will matter. The university's centres, groups, and partnership programme can then be used to locate a relevant setting for the work. A reader should be able to explain whether the project needs data from people, a physical prototype, a record of change, an observation in place, or a comparison between conditions. That explanation makes collaboration concrete rather than simply attractive in principle.

Brighton examples distinguish evidence for health, education, and social inquiry

Recent University of Brighton research stories include low-cost three-dimensional printed medical sensors, a book on the postdigital future of education, and a project examining structural bias in body-image research. Each topic points toward a different research material. Work on a sensor can involve design choices, component behaviour, measurements, and the conditions under which a device is used. A study of education can investigate teaching practices, digital systems, learner experiences, institutional choices, or public arguments about technology. Research on body image may need concepts, measures, participant experience, published studies, and the assumptions built into an existing field.

These differences matter because a broad term such as wellbeing or technology does not tell a researcher what can actually be observed. A Brighton question about healthcare might ask whether a device registers a defined signal under specified conditions. A question about education could ask how a particular digital practice changes a learning activity. A question about body image may ask what a measurement overlooks and whose experience is missing from its design. When the material, setting, and possible record are clear from the outset, an appropriate university route comes into focus: a research group, centre, partnership, publication, or another part of the research structure.

Research organisation, integrity, and the Pure database help Brighton work remain traceable

The University of Brighton also makes research organisation, research integrity policies, researcher development, and its Pure research database visible. These features are valuable at different stages of an enquiry. A research database can show how an area is described and what kinds of output have been produced. Integrity guidance matters when a project involves people, data, materials, or relationships that need careful handling. Research development can help clarify the practical work of framing a question, documenting a method, and communicating a result. None of these parts can decide the question automatically, but each can help keep the work accountable to the evidence it uses.

A strong Brighton search therefore starts with a small, observable uncertainty rather than with a large subject name. It might concern a sensor response, a digital learning practice, a representation in a body-image measure, or a local problem approached with a community partner. The next step is to choose the form of evidence that could challenge an initial assumption. With that decision made, the university's centres, groups, partnership routes, integrity guidance, and research database become practical ways to develop the work. The result is a research direction that remains tied to a real question and a method capable of answering it.

Institution record

Country
United Kingdom
Region
Europe
Status
Public
QS size code
L
Profile record updated
July 24, 2026

This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.

Search opportunities

Opportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.