University of East Anglia (UEA)
#381
QS World University Rankings 2026
39.4
QS 2026 overall score
Ranking data
QS World University Rankings source#381
QS World University Rankings 2026
#332
QS World University Rankings 2025
39.4
QS 2026 overall score
Indicator-level data
Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.
Academic reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 24.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #514
Employer reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 15
- QS 2026 rank
- #701
Faculty-student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 24
- QS 2026 rank
- #753
Citations per faculty
- QS 2026 score
- 55.5
- QS 2026 rank
- #324
International faculty ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 81.9
- QS 2026 rank
- #278
International student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 49.3
- QS 2026 rank
- #413
International student diversity
- QS 2026 score
- 54
- QS 2026 rank
- #380
International research network
- QS 2026 score
- 86.8
- QS 2026 rank
- #224
Employment outcomes
- QS 2026 score
- 31.8
- QS 2026 rank
- #528
Sustainability
- QS 2026 score
- 91.1
- QS 2026 rank
- #54
About University of East Anglia (UEA)
University of East Anglia research is framed through climate, creativity, and health
The University of East Anglia presents research through three public interdisciplinary themes: climate, creative work, and health. These themes can help a reader make an early map of a question that crosses conventional subject boundaries. A climate question may involve natural systems, public policy, data, culture, economics, or engineering. A health question may involve biology, communities, services, behavior, technology, or history. A creative theme can involve arts, media, communication, education, and public engagement. The themes are useful entry points, but they do not replace the local source that explains how a particular group defines its research object and method.
The research page also describes work that informs public understanding, policy, organizations, and everyday practice. This wider context can show how research is connected to the world beyond a university. It should not be mistaken for proof that every project has the same impact or external relationship. For a focused comparison, identify the current research setting first. Look for the faculty, centre, laboratory, or project that names the problem and the evidence used to examine it. That local description is more useful than a general theme because it can show whether the work is empirical, theoretical, creative, technical, or mixed.
Interdisciplinary themes at UEA need a specific research route
University of East Anglia's climate, creative, and health themes offer a way to search across departments. They are not a claim that a reader will find one single research community under each word. Each theme can contain several questions and methods. A climate project may use field measurements, modeling, records, policy analysis, or social research. A creative project may use artistic practice, archives, media analysis, interviews, or design. A health project may work with laboratory evidence, population data, clinical material, or public services. The task is to find the page where the relevant version of the question is described clearly enough to compare.
The university overview can help locate the broader academic environment, while research pages can show thematic routes. Use both carefully. An overview often describes the institution's learning and public setting. A research theme can explain how people from different fields are brought into conversation. Neither necessarily identifies a particular team. Follow promising terms toward a current project, a research centre, or an individual profile. Then record the object of work and the approach. This prevents a common mistake in interdisciplinary research searches: assuming that shared language means researchers are studying the same thing in the same way.
Compare UEA research through the question behind the theme
A practical University of East Anglia research note starts with the question behind a theme. Instead of writing climate, identify a system, place, policy, or dataset. Instead of writing health, identify a condition, population, service, or biological process. Instead of writing creativity, identify the material, practice, audience, or cultural setting. Next, locate the group that uses the closest evidence and method. The official page may describe experiments, field data, modeling, archives, interviews, media, design, or other research practices. These details make a comparison useful because they show how a general concern becomes a piece of research work.
Keep the note open to revision. A theme can evolve, a project may be completed, and an individual research profile may change. Recheck the closest local source before treating an early connection as current. UEA's public research material is valuable because it helps readers move from large societal questions toward more focused academic routes. The strongest conclusion should remain concise: state the research object, the local setting, and the visible method. That is enough to support a careful comparison without making claims that the official material does not establish.
Institution record
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Region
- Europe
- Status
- Public
- QS size code
- L
- Profile record updated
- July 24, 2026
This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.
Search opportunitiesOpportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.