Skip to main content
AcademicWingsSTEM discovery
Institution profile

University of Leicester

United KingdomEurope

#326

QS World University Rankings 2026

42.9

QS 2026 overall score

QS World University Rankings data

Ranking data

QS World University Rankings source

#326

QS World University Rankings 2026

#285

QS World University Rankings 2025

42.9

QS 2026 overall score

QS 2026 indicators

Indicator-level data

Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.

Academic reputation

QS 2026 score
29.6
QS 2026 rank
#418

Employer reputation

QS 2026 score
17.7
QS 2026 rank
#701

Faculty-student ratio

QS 2026 score
40.1
QS 2026 rank
#502

Citations per faculty

QS 2026 score
44.2
QS 2026 rank
#426

International faculty ratio

QS 2026 score
90.6
QS 2026 rank
#220

International student ratio

QS 2026 score
90.6
QS 2026 rank
#162

International student diversity

QS 2026 score
91.4
QS 2026 rank
#137

International research network

QS 2026 score
91.1
QS 2026 rank
#155

Employment outcomes

QS 2026 score
31
QS 2026 rank
#535

Sustainability

QS 2026 score
81.2
QS 2026 rank
#158
University profile

About University of Leicester

Six themes offer a structured way to explore research

University of Leicester organises public research material through six themes: human health, earth and environment, space power and AI, heritage and culture, social justice, and molecules and materials. These themes provide a useful initial map for exploring a question that might cross disciplines. They are not individual programme descriptions. Each theme can contain work with different methods, sources of evidence, and academic settings. Use the theme to locate researchers, stories, or research groups, then identify the school, department, or doctoral setting where the work is actually organised.

The research pages also point to research degrees, the Doctoral College, research experts, and current research news. This provides several routes for moving from a broad topic to a visible academic context. A news item can reveal a current project; an expert profile can show a particular field; a school or department page explains the disciplinary setting. Read these resources together, while keeping the degree-bearing unit at the centre of the comparison. A subject label alone does not show whether a research path is a realistic fit.

The university's history gives context, not a research answer

Leicester was founded in 1921 by its community as a living memorial to people affected by the First World War. Its public identity connects this history with education, research, community engagement, and a broad range of subjects. That background can help explain the institution's public purpose, but it does not determine the direction of a particular research group. Keep historical context separate from current research evidence. The material that matters most for an individual decision is the current work described by the academic unit closest to your planned field.

This is especially important when an interest appears across more than one theme. Health can relate to molecules, environment, data, policy, or social justice; space and AI can involve technical, scientific, and cultural questions. Instead of treating the theme list as a set of fixed pathways, use it to formulate a more precise question. Then look for the researchers, departments, and projects that use comparable concepts, methods, or evidence.

Build a Leicester shortlist around evidence you can revisit

For each University of Leicester option, record the academic unit, the research theme that helped you find it, and the local work that creates the actual connection. Add a short statement of what you bring to the question. It might involve data analysis, experimental work, archival sources, public-service experience, a prior thesis, or a technical project. This should make the research relationship understandable without broad statements about the university as a whole.

Before using the record to make a decision, check the most recent programme, researcher, and group information. Research activity changes, and the local pages are usually more informative than a central theme overview. A well-supported Leicester comparison shows a direct line from your question to the visible academic setting where that question is currently being explored. The Doctoral College and theme pages give useful institutional context, while the departmental and researcher material determines whether the current work has the methodological and intellectual connection you need. This protects against confusing a broad theme with a local research path.

Institution record

Country
United Kingdom
Region
Europe
Status
Public
QS size code
L
Profile record updated
July 24, 2026

This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.

Search opportunities

Opportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.