University of Reading
#194
QS World University Rankings 2026
56.2
QS 2026 overall score
Ranking data
QS World University Rankings source#194
QS World University Rankings 2026
#172
QS World University Rankings 2025
56.2
QS 2026 overall score
Indicator-level data
Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.
Academic reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 45.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #256
Employer reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 46.8
- QS 2026 rank
- #280
Faculty-student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 20.2
- QS 2026 rank
- #801
Citations per faculty
- QS 2026 score
- 63
- QS 2026 rank
- #260
International faculty ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 95
- QS 2026 rank
- #178
International student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 85.8
- QS 2026 rank
- #192
International student diversity
- QS 2026 score
- 87
- QS 2026 rank
- #162
International research network
- QS 2026 score
- 93.3
- QS 2026 rank
- #121
Employment outcomes
- QS 2026 score
- 57.6
- QS 2026 rank
- #287
Sustainability
- QS 2026 score
- 92.4
- QS 2026 rank
- #42
About University of Reading
Use Reading's subject structure to identify the real route
The University of Reading presents undergraduate and postgraduate study across a broad subject list that includes science, technology, climate, agriculture, health-related areas, business, arts, and social sciences. Its public information also connects the university's work with learning, new knowledge, diversity of ideas, and care for the environment. For a prospective researcher, that range is a reason to start narrowly. Find the exact programme or research route first, then identify the school or department that manages it. A familiar topic may appear in more than one subject area, and the route you choose determines the academic approach you will actually develop.
The subject list is a useful discovery tool, but it does not replace the local programme description. Read the named route to see how it frames the field, which methods or themes appear in its work, and what academic setting surrounds it. That check can reveal important differences between options that look similar in a search. One route may focus on a scientific question, another on a built-environment problem, and another on the social or organisational side of the same issue. A careful Reading comparison should be built from those local differences rather than from broad phrases about the university.
Treat Reading's public priorities as starting points for research
The University of Reading describes its institutional approach through learning, knowledge creation, diversity of people and ideas, and environmental care. These themes can help you understand the values and questions that appear across the university. They are not a substitute for checking a particular programme, department, or research group. If one of the themes relates to your work, use it to find the relevant unit and then look for current material that gives it a specific academic form. The question is not whether a theme appears on a public page. It is how the selected route engages with it in practice.
This is particularly useful for interdisciplinary interests. A topic such as climate, food, data, health, or sustainability can connect several fields, but a strong study plan still needs a primary home. Identify the discipline that supplies the main method or framework, then use another Reading area only when it adds a documented connection. This keeps the comparison grounded. It also avoids the temptation to describe every university-wide value as part of one degree. A narrower evidence trail is easier to test and more helpful when deciding what to investigate next.
Make a Reading note that links question, route, and setting
For every University of Reading option you keep on a shortlist, write three sentences: one on the question you want to work on, one on the exact academic route, and one on the department or research setting that makes the route meaningful. Add a short explanation of your preparation, such as previous coursework, a research project, technical experience, or a practical issue you want to understand more deeply. This simple note can expose whether the connection is real. If the route and setting cannot be described without general language, return to the current programme pages and refine the search.
Use the pages maintained by the relevant academic unit for final checks as your plans develop. Staff interests and programme details may shift, and a central subject list cannot settle those local questions. The purpose of this profile is to make the first investigation more organised. University of Reading is a stronger candidate when your question, the named route, and the local academic setting are clearly connected. When only the broad subject is clear, more research is needed before the option can be compared fairly with others.
Institution record
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Region
- Europe
- Status
- Public
- QS size code
- L
- Profile record updated
- July 24, 2026
This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.
Search opportunitiesOpportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.