QS ranking profile
University of St Andrews
This page presents clearly labeled QS ranking data for orientation. It does not verify programs, supervisors, funding, admission requirements, or the university's website.
- QS 2026 rank
- #113
- Down 9 places since 2025
- QS 2025 rank
- #104
- Overall score
- 66.4
Explore opportunities at University of St Andrews
Browse active research positions, doctoral fellowships, and university funding calls indexed from official faculties and verified sources.
QS indicators
Reported ranking indicators
Each indicator is scored out of 100 in the same QS snapshot as the summary above.
#165 worldwide
#127 worldwide
#278 worldwide
#368 worldwide
#131 worldwide
#47 worldwide
#36 worldwide
#208 worldwide
#575 worldwide
#97 worldwide
Institution profile
How QS classifies this institution
QS groups institutions by size, subject range, and research output.
- Size
- Medium
- About 5,000 to 12,000 students
- Subject range
- Full comprehensive
- All main faculty areas, including a medical school
- Research intensity
- Very high
- Very high research output in the QS classification
- Region
- Europe
- QS regional grouping
University profile
About University of St Andrews
Editorial background written for orientation. Verify programs, funding, and admission on the university's official pages.
Four faculties provide the first route into the university
University of St Andrews is organised through academic schools and departments within four faculties. Its public research pages also point to schools, centres, institutes, a research portal, researcher information, publications, and research data. For a prospective researcher, this offers a useful route through a university that may otherwise seem difficult to navigate from a general overview. Begin with the faculty or school closest to your subject, then follow the links to the department, centre, or group that shows active work in the area you want to explore.
The university describes research across topics ranging from historical study to contemporary scientific work. That breadth is an invitation to search carefully, not a reason to assume that every related topic shares one structure. A research centre may connect people across departments, while an academic school may provide the main disciplinary setting. Read both types of pages when they are relevant. The aim is to identify which unit explains the question, methods, and people closest to your own planned work.
Research infrastructure and practice can sharpen a fit check
St Andrews provides public information on postgraduate research degrees, researcher support, research data management, Open Access, integrity, ethics, and high-performance computing. These resources help show that research is connected to shared practices as well as to particular academic teams. They are useful for asking better questions about a potential research environment. If your work could involve data-intensive methods, computational analysis, collaboration, or a formal ethics process, look for the way the relevant school or group connects to those wider resources. Do not assume that a central service automatically defines the experience of every researcher.
The research pages also include routes to find researchers and collaborators. Use these tools to narrow a broad interest into a small number of current academic connections. A useful profile is not a long list of names. It is a concise explanation of why a particular research question belongs in a named school, department, or centre and why the people or projects visible there relate to your background. Keep a distinction between an institutional research resource and the group that would actually shape the intellectual work.
Keep a St Andrews shortlist specific and current
A strong University of St Andrews note should include the academic school or department, the research unit if one is directly relevant, and one clear statement about your planned question. Add the evidence you bring to that question, such as a prior project, field method, technical practice, body of data, or research problem. This makes the comparison more useful than an impression based on the age of the institution or its general research activity. It also makes it easier to see when two apparently similar options are actually built around different academic cultures or methods.
Check the current pages maintained by the named unit before you make a decision. Research activity, group membership, and programme detail can change even when a university-level description remains the same. The QS data above is a labelled institutional reference. It does not measure the fit of a particular school, research group, or prospective project at University of St Andrews. Let the final shortlist decision follow the evidence closest to the work you want to do.