Skip to main content
AcademicWings STEM discovery

QS ranking profile

University of Surrey

United Kingdom Public

This page presents clearly labeled QS ranking data for orientation. It does not verify programs, supervisors, funding, admission requirements, or the university's website.

QS 2026 rank
#262
Up 23 places since 2025
QS 2025 rank
#285
Overall score
49.3
Verified Catalog STEM PhDs, Postdocs & Fellowships

Explore opportunities at University of Surrey

Browse active research positions, doctoral fellowships, and university funding calls indexed from official faculties and verified sources.

QS indicators

Reported ranking indicators

Each indicator is scored out of 100 in the same QS snapshot as the summary above.

Academic reputation 29.7

#411 worldwide

Employer reputation 30

#475 worldwide

Faculty-student ratio 33.4

#583 worldwide

Citations per faculty 74.4

#182 worldwide

International faculty ratio 98

#139 worldwide

International student ratio 88.7

#181 worldwide

International student diversity 89.7

#152 worldwide

International research network 86.6

#227 worldwide

Employment outcomes 30.7

#539 worldwide

Sustainability 60.4

#499 worldwide

Institution profile

How QS classifies this institution

QS groups institutions by size, subject range, and research output.

Size
Large
About 12,000 to 30,000 students
Subject range
Comprehensive
Teaches across all main faculty areas
Research intensity
Very high
Very high research output in the QS classification
Region
Europe
QS regional grouping

University profile

About University of Surrey

Editorial background written for orientation. Verify programs, funding, and admission on the university's official pages.

Use Surrey's research themes to frame a narrow question

University of Surrey presents research through themes, institutes, centres, facilities, research stories, and a research and innovation strategy. This is a useful public map for someone whose interest begins with a broad challenge. A theme can help name a problem and point toward the parts of the University where related work is visible. It is not a complete account of a degree or research route. Start by identifying the question you want to explore, then find the department or programme that gives the question a disciplinary home. Only after that should you use the wider research material to understand the setting around the route.

This sequence makes comparisons more reliable. A theme may draw together people who work with different methods, data, or practical contexts. One researcher may approach a topic through engineering, another through health, computing, policy, business, or a social-science lens. The local academic unit is where those differences become clear. Read its current material and note the approach that actually connects with your own background. That prevents a theme from carrying more weight than it should and gives a more accurate picture of the work you would be preparing to undertake.

Treat institutes, centres, and facilities as research context

Surrey's research page groups institutes, centres, and facilities alongside research themes. These structures can be valuable when you want to see how a problem is explored beyond a single classroom or departmental label. An institute may bring people together around a question, while a facility may support specialist methods or equipment. Neither should be assumed to belong to every programme that shares a word with it. Trace any connection back to the department or route you selected. A direct link through staff, projects, or programme material is much more useful than a list of attractive names from a central research page.

Research stories can also be a helpful discovery tool. They may show the type of problem a group is addressing and introduce vocabulary that leads to deeper reading. A story is not a full representation of an academic area, however. Follow it to the research unit and check whether the work is current and relevant to the programme under consideration. This habit produces a more honest comparison. It recognises the value of the wider research ecosystem while keeping the academic route, rather than a single story or facility, at the centre of your decision.

Make a Surrey evidence card before moving forward

A useful University of Surrey evidence card contains the exact programme or research route, the responsible academic unit, one current research connection, and a short statement of your preparation. The research connection could be a theme, institute, centre, facility, or ongoing problem, but only where the relationship to the route is visible. Your preparation may include a previous research project, a method you have learned, a technical challenge, or an issue from work or study. The card should be specific enough to show why this option deserves more attention and short enough to expose anything that is still uncertain.

Revisit the relevant departmental pages when your comparison becomes more serious. University-level research information changes in emphasis, and individual units may update their activity or descriptions. This overview is a planning tool for the early stage. Surrey is a stronger candidate when the research question, the academic route, and the evidence from the local setting point in the same direction. If the theme is appealing but the programme link remains vague, make that gap visible and continue the search instead of treating a broad research page as a final answer.