Skip to main content
AcademicWingsSTEM discovery
Institution profile

Arizona State University

United States of AmericaAmericas

#173

QS World University Rankings 2026

59.1

QS 2026 overall score

QS World University Rankings data

Ranking data

QS World University Rankings source

#173

QS World University Rankings 2026

#200

QS World University Rankings 2025

59.1

QS 2026 overall score

QS 2026 indicators

Indicator-level data

Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.

Academic reputation

QS 2026 score
63.9
QS 2026 rank
#159

Employer reputation

QS 2026 score
63.3
QS 2026 rank
#171

Faculty-student ratio

QS 2026 score
9.5
QS 2026 rank
#801

Citations per faculty

QS 2026 score
61.5
QS 2026 rank
#277

International faculty ratio

QS 2026 score
72.5
QS 2026 rank
#326

International student ratio

QS 2026 score
53.2
QS 2026 rank
#385

International student diversity

QS 2026 score
57.7
QS 2026 rank
#353

International research network

QS 2026 score
95.2
QS 2026 rank
#81

Employment outcomes

QS 2026 score
42.2
QS 2026 rank
#415

Sustainability

QS 2026 score
85.8
QS 2026 rank
#102
University profile

About Arizona State University

Knowledge Enterprise provides a cross-campus research layer

Arizona State University presents Knowledge Enterprise as the part of the university that connects research, innovation, entrepreneurship, and strategic partnerships. This is useful for understanding how a broad public university can bring people together across fields and locations. It does not identify the academic home of a particular question by itself. If your interest is in computing, health, sustainability, engineering, social systems, or another area, begin with the discipline and then see how Knowledge Enterprise may provide a wider connection. The meaningful evidence still comes from a school, laboratory, centre, project, or researcher that describes the work in enough detail to be compared.

ASU's main public material also shows a university with several physical settings, including Tempe, Polytechnic, West Valley, Downtown Phoenix, SkySong, Los Angeles, and Washington, D.C. Multiple locations can matter when research activity is distributed, but a campus name does not say what is being studied there. Avoid treating geography as a research fit signal. Instead, use it to ask a better question: where is the relevant academic unit located, and does its current work show the methods, people, or resources that connect with your research direction? A location becomes useful only when it is tied to visible work.

Public examples point to research questions, not blanket claims

Knowledge Enterprise uses examples that include earlier disease diagnosis, semiconductor work in Arizona, water use in a desert setting, artificial intelligence for health, and the commercialisation of fusion energy. These examples can help a reader see the kinds of practical questions being discussed across ASU. They should not be used as a substitute for a local research search. A single public example may represent one team, initiative, or moment in a larger field. Follow the theme to a unit that explains its current research object, evidence, and approach before deciding whether it relates closely to your own work.

The university also makes research resources, facility access, external partnership information, intellectual property guidance, and research-cycle support visible. This can be helpful for understanding the institutional system around a research project. It cannot show what a particular laboratory does every day or whether a specific project is active. Separate these two levels in your note. One line can describe the surrounding research framework, while another should name the actual group or project that gives your topic a clear academic home. The separation keeps a large institutional ecosystem from becoming an unsupported personal conclusion.

Test an Arizona State University research connection

For Arizona State University, write the research problem before naming the institution. Identify one discipline or local unit where the problem seems to belong. Then find a person, group, centre, laboratory, or initiative whose public work states the question in a more precise way. Explain the overlap through something tangible: a computational approach, a health outcome, a water system, a manufactured material, a social setting, or a research design. Do not rely only on the word interdisciplinary. The comparison becomes useful when it shows what crosses disciplines and where the core expertise remains.

Finish by identifying the evidence that would change your view. A promising initiative may be institution-wide while the nearest research team uses a different method. A campus may host relevant activity without being central to the question. Knowledge Enterprise makes the wider structure visible, and that is valuable. The final assessment should stay close to current material from the academic setting that actually carries the research. This produces a clear, revisable record instead of a broad description that could fit almost any large university.

Institution record

Country
United States of America
Region
Americas
Status
Public
QS size code
XL
Profile record updated
July 24, 2026

This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.

Search opportunities

Opportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.