Skip to main content
AcademicWings STEM discovery

QS ranking profile

Cornell University

United States of America Private not for Profit

This page presents clearly labeled QS ranking data for orientation. It does not verify programs, supervisors, funding, admission requirements, or the university's website.

QS 2026 rank
#16
No change since 2025
QS 2025 rank
#16
Overall score
91.6
Verified Catalog STEM PhDs, Postdocs & Fellowships

Explore opportunities at Cornell University

Browse active research positions, doctoral fellowships, and university funding calls indexed from official faculties and verified sources.

QS indicators

Reported ranking indicators

Each indicator is scored out of 100 in the same QS snapshot as the summary above.

Academic reputation 99.5

#25 worldwide

Employer reputation 98.8

#27 worldwide

Faculty-student ratio 64.3

#276 worldwide

Citations per faculty 98

#48 worldwide

International faculty ratio 57.6

#401 worldwide

International student ratio 75.7

#251 worldwide

International student diversity 56.4

#363 worldwide

International research network 93

#126 worldwide

Employment outcomes 99.3

#24 worldwide

Sustainability 76.8

#218 worldwide

Institution profile

How QS classifies this institution

QS groups institutions by size, subject range, and research output.

Size
Large
About 12,000 to 30,000 students
Subject range
Focused
Teaches a limited range of faculty areas
Research intensity
Very high
Very high research output in the QS classification
Region
Americas
QS regional grouping

University profile

About Cornell University

Editorial background written for orientation. Verify programs, funding, and admission on the university's official pages.

Cornell's graduate fields and cross-disciplinary structure

Cornell University is a private research university with graduate study organized through fields of study as well as colleges, departments, and campuses. That field structure is especially important for applicants because it can cross traditional departmental lines. Cornell's Graduate School describes fields as communities formed around shared intellectual interests, and research students may work with faculty from more than one academic area. This gives students a formal way to build a broader academic framework, but it does not make every combination possible. The first job for a prospective applicant is to find the exact field and degree, then understand how it is connected to the college, department, and faculty work that matters to the proposed area of study.

The language of a Cornell field can sometimes look wider than the name of a conventional department. That is useful, but it makes careful reading even more important. Start with the official field listing and degree options. Then read the field's own page, relevant faculty profiles, and current requirements. For research degrees, Cornell's academic materials explain the role of a special committee in helping shape a student's program of study. An applicant should not assume how that committee will work in practice before enrollment. Instead, use it as a reason to check which faculty participate in the field, what expertise they bring, and whether the field gives a realistic home to the research question you want to pursue.

Research choices that go beyond one department page

Cornell's official graduate information describes research and professional degrees across many fields, including opportunities that can involve different Cornell locations. This may be relevant when a prospective student sees a program connected to Ithaca, Cornell Tech, a medical setting, or another named campus context. The correct approach is to follow the current program page rather than assuming that every Cornell location is available to every degree. A university-wide profile can introduce the range of activity, but the field's official information tells you where study is based, what form the degree takes, and which academic unit is responsible for it.

For a science or engineering applicant, a productive research check begins with methods, not labels. Look for a faculty member's recent work, the research facilities named by the field, and the training structure described for students. Then ask whether those elements form one credible path. A lab may be interesting without being open to students in the proposed program. A research center may be relevant without supervising the degree. Cornell's flexible structure can be a real strength when it is used with care. It should lead applicants toward better questions about faculty participation, advising, and program expectations rather than toward a vague claim that the university is interdisciplinary.

How to research Cornell University before applying

Make a Cornell application note that records the exact graduate field, degree type, primary academic contacts listed by the field, and the official admissions page you need to revisit. Add a concise explanation of the research match: perhaps a group of faculty working across related subjects, a course of study that combines methods you need, or a formal program linked to the right facilities. Avoid using a university-wide achievement as the main reason for applying. What matters more is whether the field can support your planned work and whether the current requirements match your preparation. This approach is useful for both doctoral applicants and students comparing course-based or research master's options.

The final check should focus on facts that are specific to the field and may change. Verify the degree's deadline, materials, prerequisites, required tests when applicable, and any instructions about identifying potential advisers. Cornell's central Graduate School provides helpful context, but each field makes its own admissions decisions and may have distinct expectations. Cornell University belongs on a shortlist when you can connect the field structure, faculty work, and your next academic step in a clear sentence. If that sentence stays generic, keep investigating the current official pages. A careful match is more valuable than a broad institutional preference.