QS ranking profile
Dartmouth College
This page presents clearly labeled QS ranking data for orientation. It does not verify programs, supervisors, funding, admission requirements, or the university's website.
- QS 2026 rank
- #247
- Down 4 places since 2025
- QS 2025 rank
- #243
- Overall score
- 50.6
Explore opportunities at Dartmouth College
Browse active research positions, doctoral fellowships, and university funding calls indexed from official faculties and verified sources.
QS indicators
Reported ranking indicators
Each indicator is scored out of 100 in the same QS snapshot as the summary above.
#398 worldwide
#225 worldwide
#167 worldwide
#307 worldwide
#801 worldwide
#351 worldwide
#318 worldwide
#801 worldwide
#122 worldwide
#146 worldwide
Institution profile
How QS classifies this institution
QS groups institutions by size, subject range, and research output.
- Size
- Medium
- About 5,000 to 12,000 students
- Subject range
- Focused
- Teaches a limited range of faculty areas
- Research intensity
- Very high
- Very high research output in the QS classification
- Region
- Americas
- QS regional grouping
University profile
About Dartmouth College
Editorial background written for orientation. Verify programs, funding, and admission on the university's official pages.
Departments, schools, and research connections
Dartmouth College presents academic work through more than forty departments and programmes in arts and sciences, alongside the Geisel School of Medicine, Guarini School of Graduate and Advanced Studies, Thayer School of Engineering, and Tuck School of Business. This arrangement is useful for STEM researchers because a question may begin in a traditional department and develop through a professional school, a centre, or an institute. Computing, earth sciences, engineering, biological sciences, mathematics, physics and astronomy, and psychological and brain sciences all appear within the broader academic map.
The college also describes research across departments, programmes, and schools. For someone investigating a possible research setting, this means the first page is only a starting point. Find the department that holds the foundational knowledge, then look for centres, institutes, and researchers whose current work makes the subject tangible. A university-wide statement about collaboration is helpful background, but it cannot show whether a particular laboratory, research team, or academic area addresses the problem you want to study.
Research questions that cross established fields
Dartmouth's research pages highlight work related to climate change, cancer immunotherapy, cybersecurity, social questions, ecology, space-related science, robotics, and computational methods. The examples show that a research problem can travel across disciplinary boundaries without losing its specific academic base. A climate question may be rooted in earth sciences or environmental studies; a health question may connect medicine, biology, engineering, or data analysis. The point of reading these examples is not to claim a connection from a theme alone. It is to identify the unit where an active question, method, and researcher meet.
The public site also points to a wide range of centres and institutes spanning arts, science, medicine, engineering, and business. A centre can be a valuable route into a cross-field topic, but it should be read with its associated academic departments. This helps answer practical questions about where the relevant expertise is based and how different fields relate. When recent work uses language that fits your interests, follow it to the people and units responsible for the work instead of relying only on the central research description.
A careful Dartmouth research comparison
A useful Dartmouth comparison records three things: the academic department or school, the smaller research setting, and a clear reason for the connection. The reason might be a technique you have already used, a scientific problem you want to explore, or a bridge between two fields. Keep it concrete. A statement such as an interest in technology or health is not enough until it is connected to an identifiable research environment and current work. Narrow notes are more useful than a long list of general similarities.
The central Dartmouth pages offer a broad view of departments, schools, centres, and research activity. Field-level pages should carry more weight when you decide whether a research route deserves further attention. The numerical information shown before this profile is an institutional comparison aid, not an evaluation of one project, supervisor, or group. Revisit the pages closest to your intended field when you refine your shortlist, because the relevant projects and people may change over time.