Skip to main content
AcademicWingsSTEM discovery
Institution profile

Michigan State University

United States of AmericaAmericas

#161

QS World University Rankings 2026

60.9

QS 2026 overall score

QS World University Rankings data

Ranking data

QS World University Rankings source

#161

QS World University Rankings 2026

#152

QS World University Rankings 2025

60.9

QS 2026 overall score

QS 2026 indicators

Indicator-level data

Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.

Academic reputation

QS 2026 score
67.3
QS 2026 rank
#146

Employer reputation

QS 2026 score
62.9
QS 2026 rank
#174

Faculty-student ratio

QS 2026 score
13.9
QS 2026 rank
#801

Citations per faculty

QS 2026 score
61.2
QS 2026 rank
#280

International faculty ratio

QS 2026 score
67.2
QS 2026 rank
#348

International student ratio

QS 2026 score
21.1
QS 2026 rank
#708

International student diversity

QS 2026 score
27.3
QS 2026 rank
#649

International research network

QS 2026 score
97.6
QS 2026 rank
#27

Employment outcomes

QS 2026 score
75.6
QS 2026 rank
#180

Sustainability

QS 2026 score
94.2
QS 2026 rank
#28
University profile

About Michigan State University

Michigan State research combines discovery with problem-solving traditions

Michigan State University describes research and creative activity as part of the daily work of its professors and researchers. Its public material places that activity in a land-grant, problem-solving tradition and connects it with questions that affect people, society, and the natural world. Examples include climate-resilient agriculture, supply-chain management, approaches to STEM education, water, health, and community questions. This gives a reader a broad map of visible work. It does not show where every related topic is located. The next step is to find the research centre, project, laboratory, or academic profile where the inquiry takes a concrete form.

The university's research stories range from historical work on corn and anticancer drugs to current work on water protection and substance-use treatment. Such examples are useful because they show how an institutional mission becomes a defined research problem. They are not a substitute for current local evidence. A researcher interested in agriculture, health, education, or operations should check the unit behind the relevant work and see whether the research object and approach are close to their own interests. Similar public language does not always mean the same methods or research setting.

Research integrity and collaboration are part of the surrounding structure

Michigan State's Office of Research and Innovation describes support for research integrity, regulatory compliance, collaboration, licensing of university inventions, and research development. These functions show part of the framework around research activity. They can be relevant when a question involves responsible conduct, a partnership, or a path from research to use beyond the university. They do not define the content of a group's work. For a careful comparison, use the central office material to understand the surrounding structure and use local academic material to determine whether the research question is actually being examined there.

The office also makes institutes and centres visible, as well as initiatives related to water and a partnership with Henry Ford Health. A named initiative can be a valuable point of investigation when it concerns the same system or public issue as your work. It is still important to trace the initiative to the people and projects involved. Look for a description that names the specific problem, setting, data, or intervention. This lets you distinguish a potentially useful institutional connection from a broad announcement that does not reveal the current research route.

Find a Michigan State research connection by following the problem

A practical Michigan State University note begins with the problem, not the university's general reputation or size. State what you want to investigate, then find the closest local research setting. It may be connected with agricultural resilience, water, health, education, supply chains, a scientific mechanism, or another visible area. Add evidence that explains how the question is approached. A laboratory page may show an experimental system, while a research centre may show a community issue or field of practice. The purpose is to identify the place where the problem has a concrete research form.

Finish by separating institutional context from verified local evidence. The Office of Research and Innovation can show that integrity, collaboration, and research development are part of the university's structure. It cannot establish that a particular team is currently working on your exact question. Keep a short list of confirmed facts, useful leads, and missing details. That restraint makes later comparison easier and keeps the profile accurate when the public research pages are updated.

Institution record

Country
United States of America
Region
Americas
Status
Public
QS size code
XL
Profile record updated
July 24, 2026

This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.

Search opportunities

Opportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.