QS ranking profile
Rice University
This page presents clearly labeled QS ranking data for orientation. It does not verify programs, supervisors, funding, admission requirements, or the university's website.
- QS 2026 rank
- #119
- Up 22 places since 2025
- QS 2025 rank
- #141
- Overall score
- 65.7
Explore opportunities at Rice University
Browse active research positions, doctoral fellowships, and university funding calls indexed from official faculties and verified sources.
QS indicators
Reported ranking indicators
Each indicator is scored out of 100 in the same QS snapshot as the summary above.
#221 worldwide
#245 worldwide
#196 worldwide
#148 worldwide
#215 worldwide
#104 worldwide
#91 worldwide
#605 worldwide
#381 worldwide
#156 worldwide
Institution profile
How QS classifies this institution
QS groups institutions by size, subject range, and research output.
- Size
- Medium
- About 5,000 to 12,000 students
- Subject range
- Comprehensive
- Teaches across all main faculty areas
- Research intensity
- Very high
- Very high research output in the QS classification
- Region
- Americas
- QS regional grouping
University profile
About Rice University
Editorial background written for orientation. Verify programs, funding, and admission on the university's official pages.
Research questions that move across technical fields
Rice University presents much of its research through interdisciplinary institutes and centres rather than through one long subject list. Its current material points to nanoscale science, computing, quantum studies, and work that connects biology, chemistry, and engineering. It also frames research around questions such as climate change, water pollution, human health, and economic or social disparities. That combination is useful for a researcher whose question does not stay inside one department. It is not a shortcut, however. A broad institutional theme can introduce a topic, while a particular institute, laboratory, or group is the place where the research object and methods become clear.
A focused Rice comparison should therefore begin with the problem, not with the largest label on a central page. Someone interested in quantum materials, for example, needs to identify the setting where that material question is actually discussed. A project on health data may need evidence from a computing group and a biological or clinical collaborator. The strongest connection is one that can name the system being studied, the type of data or experiment involved, and the people or unit responsible for the work. This prevents an interdisciplinary vocabulary from being mistaken for proof that every related research path is available in the same form.
Facilities, research information, and public research stories
Rice also makes research data and computing infrastructure, libraries, databases, equipment, compliance, and safety visible in its public explanation of research activity. These details give useful context about the kinds of shared work that sit behind a research project. They do not describe the daily practice of every research group. A laboratory may use a different combination of equipment, data services, fieldwork, or external materials than another unit with a similar title. When a possible research setting looks promising, read its local pages to see whether the practical resources match the way the question needs to be investigated.
The university's research communication also groups work around health, sustainability, artificial intelligence, cancer research, biotechnology, coastal ecosystems, energy, and urban questions. This public record can help someone notice the language used across Rice and discover related areas that may not be obvious from a department name. Treat those stories as entry points rather than final evidence. A news item or research review may show one result, while the relevant long-term setting may be an institute, centre, laboratory, or academic department. The distinction matters when comparing a current research direction with a short-lived announcement.
Build a Rice University research note with precise links
Create a Rice University note in three parts. First, write one sentence about the research question in plain terms. Second, identify the institute, centre, department, or laboratory that appears closest to the work. Third, describe one concrete point of overlap, such as a measurement approach, a computational method, a material, a biological system, or a community problem. This structure leaves room for research that crosses science, engineering, the arts, or social inquiry without pretending that all connections are equally close. It also makes gaps visible early, before a broad topic becomes an unsupported conclusion.
Keep the institutional map separate from the local research evidence. Rice's public overview is helpful for seeing how computing, quantum work, nanoscale science, and interdisciplinary activity may sit beside one another. The specific research environment still needs its own check. Record which detail is confirmed by a current group page, which detail is only suggested by a wider theme, and which question needs clarification. That small discipline makes a comparison more useful over time. It gives you a clear reason to revisit the relevant unit when a project, research team, or institute description changes.