QS ranking profile
The University of Georgia
This page presents clearly labeled QS ranking data for orientation. It does not verify programs, supervisors, funding, admission requirements, or the university's website.
- QS 2026 rank
- #525
- Up 62 places since 2025
- QS 2025 rank
- #587
- Overall score
- 31.1
Explore opportunities at The University of Georgia
Browse active research positions, doctoral fellowships, and university funding calls indexed from official faculties and verified sources.
QS indicators
Reported ranking indicators
Each indicator is scored out of 100 in the same QS snapshot as the summary above.
#452 worldwide
#388 worldwide
#801 worldwide
#552 worldwide
#801 worldwide
#801 worldwide
#801 worldwide
#254 worldwide
#478 worldwide
#385 worldwide
Institution profile
How QS classifies this institution
QS groups institutions by size, subject range, and research output.
- Size
- Extra large
- More than 30,000 students
- Subject range
- Focused
- Teaches a limited range of faculty areas
- Research intensity
- Very high
- Very high research output in the QS classification
- Region
- Americas
- QS regional grouping
University profile
About The University of Georgia
Editorial background written for orientation. Verify programs, funding, and admission on the university's official pages.
The University of Georgia supports research through centres, facilities, and partnerships
The University of Georgia's Office of Research describes a system that supports research collaborations across disciplines, centres and institutes, core facilities, researcher tools, integrity and safety, technology transfer, and business engagement. The core-facilities page explains that specialised equipment and services are available not only to UGA researchers but also to other universities, government agencies, nonprofit organisations, and industry. For an applicant, this is useful institutional context because it shows how research infrastructure can sit alongside academic departments. It does not mean that every student can use every facility automatically. Access and supervision remain questions for the relevant research group.
The research office reports $654 million in research and development expenditures for fiscal year 2025 and a wider economic impact figure for the state of Georgia. Those are institutional figures reported by the university, not measures of a particular programme or individual outcome. The more useful step is to connect a broad research area to a named centre, facility, or faculty member. A question about infectious disease, imaging, fermentation, materials, isotope analysis, or clinical work will require a different setting and different technical support.
Core facilities make different scientific methods visible
UGA's core-facilities information names a range of scientific services. The Animal Health Research Center is described as a biocontainment setting for infectious microorganisms, parasites, and toxins affecting animal and human health. Other facilities cover molecular biology, fermentation, protein purification, high-containment cell culture, biomedical imaging, microscopy, mass spectrometry, nuclear magnetic resonance, isotope analysis, clinical and translational research, and pathology. The list is not a course catalogue. It is a map of the equipment, samples, and research processes that may support projects in different departments.
This range helps an applicant turn a broad interest into a testable research plan. A microscopy project asks different questions from an isotope study. A clinical investigation needs a different design from a fermentation process or a genetically modified mouse model. UGA's public research news also refers to work on GLP-1 medicines, cover crops, AI-supported work with Georgia farmers, and innovation connected to new products. These examples show how research can move from laboratory science to agriculture, health, communities, and commercial application while preserving distinct project boundaries.
A practical fit check for UGA research
Start by defining the object and evidence of your proposed project. Then use UGA's Office of Research pages to find the centre, core facility, or school that best matches it. Read the current research description of the unit and the work of possible supervisors, and note whether the methods require a facility, data source, field setting, or clinical relationship. This process is more reliable than choosing the university from a general impact figure or a single research headline.
Keep the research office map separate from the formal programme route. UGA's facilities pages explain infrastructure and services, while the department and graduate-programme pages explain the academic setting. A facility listing does not show that a specific project is available or that a named supervisor is taking students. The QS figures displayed elsewhere are university-level information, not a judgement about one laboratory. Record the exact academic unit, method, facility link, and open question in your shortlist before making a decision.