QS ranking profile
University of Maryland, College Park
This page presents clearly labeled QS ranking data for orientation. It does not verify programs, supervisors, funding, admission requirements, or the university's website.
- QS 2026 rank
- #207
- Up 11 places since 2025
- QS 2025 rank
- #218
- Overall score
- 54.9
Explore opportunities at University of Maryland, College Park
Browse active research positions, doctoral fellowships, and university funding calls indexed from official faculties and verified sources.
QS indicators
Reported ranking indicators
Each indicator is scored out of 100 in the same QS snapshot as the summary above.
#191 worldwide
#236 worldwide
#449 worldwide
#284 worldwide
#610 worldwide
#666 worldwide
#783 worldwide
#129 worldwide
#273 worldwide
#305 worldwide
Institution profile
How QS classifies this institution
QS groups institutions by size, subject range, and research output.
- Size
- Extra large
- More than 30,000 students
- Subject range
- Focused
- Teaches a limited range of faculty areas
- Research intensity
- Very high
- Very high research output in the QS classification
- Region
- Americas
- QS regional grouping
University profile
About University of Maryland, College Park
Editorial background written for orientation. Verify programs, funding, and admission on the university's official pages.
Research development, administration, and innovation form different parts of the UMD map
University of Maryland, College Park presents research through a division that includes research development, research administration, and innovation. Its public material also refers to interdisciplinary work and relationships with federal agencies, national laboratories, industry, and other partners. These routes can help explain the setting around research, but they have different meanings. Research development may help shape a research direction; administration can support processes; innovation can connect work with use beyond the university; and an external partnership may indicate a wider research context. None of these elements establishes the content of a particular laboratory or project without a local source that names the work.
The university also makes research integrity, data management, conflict-of-interest processes, human and animal research, and laboratory safety visible. These are important shared responsibilities, especially for topics that use participants, organisms, data, or specialised facilities. They should be read as institutional context rather than a shortcut to a technical conclusion. A research question still needs a specific academic home and a form of evidence. By separating the research object from the support and compliance structure, a University of Maryland, College Park profile can remain accurate even when the question reaches across several schools or external partners.
Centres and institutes show many specialised research environments
The University of Maryland, College Park research-centre catalogue makes specialised settings visible across advanced computing, data, artificial intelligence, automation, robotics, geospatial information, physics, quantum science, cybersecurity, population research, and social questions. Examples include work related to responsible artificial intelligence, machine learning, autonomous systems, quantum information, remote sensing, and research on organisations and communities. These names are useful for finding a possible research home, but they do not imply that each centre covers every aspect of its broad label. A topic should be matched to its exact system, method, or evidence base.
For instance, an artificial-intelligence question could concern machine learning theory, computer vision, robotics, data governance, law and human rights, or a domain-specific application. A quantum question could concern theory, hardware, information, materials, or a collaboration with another institution. A remote-sensing question could involve geospatial methods, satellites, environmental data, or a particular geographic problem. The centre catalogue lets a reader see these possible distinctions. The next page must show which centre, group, or researcher is actually closest to the chosen question rather than relying on a single umbrella term.
Construct a UMD research path from the object of study to the relevant centre
A precise University of Maryland, College Park note begins with an observable research object and the evidence needed to study it. This may be a model, algorithm, device, data stream, quantum system, geographic signal, population, organisational process, or policy problem. Choose the centre or institute that visibly works in that territory, then find the smaller research group, person, project, or output that establishes the direct link. If the question involves an external laboratory, government body, or industry setting, describe that relationship only when the local material makes its role clear. This approach is stronger than a long list of related centres.
The final check should state the unresolved point. A centre title may be close to the topic while its current work is not visible. A university-wide integrity page may explain a process without identifying the research practice of the group. A partnership may establish a context while the technical contribution remains unclear. These boundaries make a profile more useful, not less, because they direct the next search toward evidence that can answer the missing question. University of Maryland, College Park offers a large public map of research functions and specialised centres. A narrow evidence trail makes that map manageable and reliable.