Skip to main content
AcademicWingsSTEM discovery
Institution profile

University of Maryland, College Park

United States of AmericaAmericas

#207

QS World University Rankings 2026

54.9

QS 2026 overall score

QS World University Rankings data

Ranking data

QS World University Rankings source

#207

QS World University Rankings 2026

#218

QS World University Rankings 2025

54.9

QS 2026 overall score

QS 2026 indicators

Indicator-level data

Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.

Academic reputation

QS 2026 score
57.2
QS 2026 rank
#191

Employer reputation

QS 2026 score
51.8
QS 2026 rank
#236

Faculty-student ratio

QS 2026 score
44.2
QS 2026 rank
#449

Citations per faculty

QS 2026 score
60.5
QS 2026 rank
#284

International faculty ratio

QS 2026 score
28
QS 2026 rank
#610

International student ratio

QS 2026 score
24.9
QS 2026 rank
#666

International student diversity

QS 2026 score
18.7
QS 2026 rank
#783

International research network

QS 2026 score
92.9
QS 2026 rank
#129

Employment outcomes

QS 2026 score
59.7
QS 2026 rank
#273

Sustainability

QS 2026 score
70.7
QS 2026 rank
#305
University profile

About University of Maryland, College Park

Research development, administration, and innovation form different parts of the UMD map

University of Maryland, College Park presents research through a division that includes research development, research administration, and innovation. Its public material also refers to interdisciplinary work and relationships with federal agencies, national laboratories, industry, and other partners. These routes can help explain the setting around research, but they have different meanings. Research development may help shape a research direction; administration can support processes; innovation can connect work with use beyond the university; and an external partnership may indicate a wider research context. None of these elements establishes the content of a particular laboratory or project without a local source that names the work.

The university also makes research integrity, data management, conflict-of-interest processes, human and animal research, and laboratory safety visible. These are important shared responsibilities, especially for topics that use participants, organisms, data, or specialised facilities. They should be read as institutional context rather than a shortcut to a technical conclusion. A research question still needs a specific academic home and a form of evidence. By separating the research object from the support and compliance structure, a University of Maryland, College Park profile can remain accurate even when the question reaches across several schools or external partners.

Centres and institutes show many specialised research environments

The University of Maryland, College Park research-centre catalogue makes specialised settings visible across advanced computing, data, artificial intelligence, automation, robotics, geospatial information, physics, quantum science, cybersecurity, population research, and social questions. Examples include work related to responsible artificial intelligence, machine learning, autonomous systems, quantum information, remote sensing, and research on organisations and communities. These names are useful for finding a possible research home, but they do not imply that each centre covers every aspect of its broad label. A topic should be matched to its exact system, method, or evidence base.

For instance, an artificial-intelligence question could concern machine learning theory, computer vision, robotics, data governance, law and human rights, or a domain-specific application. A quantum question could concern theory, hardware, information, materials, or a collaboration with another institution. A remote-sensing question could involve geospatial methods, satellites, environmental data, or a particular geographic problem. The centre catalogue lets a reader see these possible distinctions. The next page must show which centre, group, or researcher is actually closest to the chosen question rather than relying on a single umbrella term.

Construct a UMD research path from the object of study to the relevant centre

A precise University of Maryland, College Park note begins with an observable research object and the evidence needed to study it. This may be a model, algorithm, device, data stream, quantum system, geographic signal, population, organisational process, or policy problem. Choose the centre or institute that visibly works in that territory, then find the smaller research group, person, project, or output that establishes the direct link. If the question involves an external laboratory, government body, or industry setting, describe that relationship only when the local material makes its role clear. This approach is stronger than a long list of related centres.

The final check should state the unresolved point. A centre title may be close to the topic while its current work is not visible. A university-wide integrity page may explain a process without identifying the research practice of the group. A partnership may establish a context while the technical contribution remains unclear. These boundaries make a profile more useful, not less, because they direct the next search toward evidence that can answer the missing question. University of Maryland, College Park offers a large public map of research functions and specialised centres. A narrow evidence trail makes that map manageable and reliable.

Institution record

Country
United States of America
Region
Americas
Status
Public
QS size code
XL
Profile record updated
July 24, 2026

This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.

Search opportunities

Opportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.