University of Maryland, College Park
#207
QS World University Rankings 2026
54.9
QS 2026 overall score
Ranking data
QS World University Rankings source#207
QS World University Rankings 2026
#218
QS World University Rankings 2025
54.9
QS 2026 overall score
Indicator-level data
Each card keeps the QS 2026 score and rank separate. A missing value is not estimated.
Academic reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 57.2
- QS 2026 rank
- #191
Employer reputation
- QS 2026 score
- 51.8
- QS 2026 rank
- #236
Faculty-student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 44.2
- QS 2026 rank
- #449
Citations per faculty
- QS 2026 score
- 60.5
- QS 2026 rank
- #284
International faculty ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 28
- QS 2026 rank
- #610
International student ratio
- QS 2026 score
- 24.9
- QS 2026 rank
- #666
International student diversity
- QS 2026 score
- 18.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #783
International research network
- QS 2026 score
- 92.9
- QS 2026 rank
- #129
Employment outcomes
- QS 2026 score
- 59.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #273
Sustainability
- QS 2026 score
- 70.7
- QS 2026 rank
- #305
About University of Maryland, College Park
Research development, administration, and innovation form different parts of the UMD map
University of Maryland, College Park presents research through a division that includes research development, research administration, and innovation. Its public material also refers to interdisciplinary work and relationships with federal agencies, national laboratories, industry, and other partners. These routes can help explain the setting around research, but they have different meanings. Research development may help shape a research direction; administration can support processes; innovation can connect work with use beyond the university; and an external partnership may indicate a wider research context. None of these elements establishes the content of a particular laboratory or project without a local source that names the work.
The university also makes research integrity, data management, conflict-of-interest processes, human and animal research, and laboratory safety visible. These are important shared responsibilities, especially for topics that use participants, organisms, data, or specialised facilities. They should be read as institutional context rather than a shortcut to a technical conclusion. A research question still needs a specific academic home and a form of evidence. By separating the research object from the support and compliance structure, a University of Maryland, College Park profile can remain accurate even when the question reaches across several schools or external partners.
Centres and institutes show many specialised research environments
The University of Maryland, College Park research-centre catalogue makes specialised settings visible across advanced computing, data, artificial intelligence, automation, robotics, geospatial information, physics, quantum science, cybersecurity, population research, and social questions. Examples include work related to responsible artificial intelligence, machine learning, autonomous systems, quantum information, remote sensing, and research on organisations and communities. These names are useful for finding a possible research home, but they do not imply that each centre covers every aspect of its broad label. A topic should be matched to its exact system, method, or evidence base.
For instance, an artificial-intelligence question could concern machine learning theory, computer vision, robotics, data governance, law and human rights, or a domain-specific application. A quantum question could concern theory, hardware, information, materials, or a collaboration with another institution. A remote-sensing question could involve geospatial methods, satellites, environmental data, or a particular geographic problem. The centre catalogue lets a reader see these possible distinctions. The next page must show which centre, group, or researcher is actually closest to the chosen question rather than relying on a single umbrella term.
Construct a UMD research path from the object of study to the relevant centre
A precise University of Maryland, College Park note begins with an observable research object and the evidence needed to study it. This may be a model, algorithm, device, data stream, quantum system, geographic signal, population, organisational process, or policy problem. Choose the centre or institute that visibly works in that territory, then find the smaller research group, person, project, or output that establishes the direct link. If the question involves an external laboratory, government body, or industry setting, describe that relationship only when the local material makes its role clear. This approach is stronger than a long list of related centres.
The final check should state the unresolved point. A centre title may be close to the topic while its current work is not visible. A university-wide integrity page may explain a process without identifying the research practice of the group. A partnership may establish a context while the technical contribution remains unclear. These boundaries make a profile more useful, not less, because they direct the next search toward evidence that can answer the missing question. University of Maryland, College Park offers a large public map of research functions and specialised centres. A narrow evidence trail makes that map manageable and reliable.
Institution record
- Country
- United States of America
- Region
- Americas
- Status
- Public
- QS size code
- XL
- Profile record updated
- July 24, 2026
This date shows when this profile was refreshed. It is not a source-verification date from QS or the university.
Search opportunitiesOpportunity records may use a different form of the institution's name. Confirm every listing with its original source.