Skip to main content
AcademicWings STEM discovery

QS ranking profile

University of Massachusetts, Amherst

United States of America Public

This page presents clearly labeled QS ranking data for orientation. It does not verify programs, supervisors, funding, admission requirements, or the university's website.

QS 2026 rank
#247
Up 28 places since 2025
QS 2025 rank
#275
Overall score
50.6
Verified Catalog STEM PhDs, Postdocs & Fellowships

Explore opportunities at University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Browse active research positions, doctoral fellowships, and university funding calls indexed from official faculties and verified sources.

QS indicators

Reported ranking indicators

Each indicator is scored out of 100 in the same QS snapshot as the summary above.

Academic reputation 48.1

#238 worldwide

Employer reputation 40

#342 worldwide

Faculty-student ratio 15.8

#801 worldwide

Citations per faculty 62.4

#266 worldwide

International faculty ratio 77.9

#307 worldwide

International student ratio 46.3

#436 worldwide

International student diversity 51.3

#404 worldwide

International research network 78.8

#372 worldwide

Employment outcomes 44.2

#399 worldwide

Sustainability 84.5

#119 worldwide

Institution profile

How QS classifies this institution

QS groups institutions by size, subject range, and research output.

Size
Large
About 12,000 to 30,000 students
Subject range
Comprehensive
Teaches across all main faculty areas
Research intensity
Very high
Very high research output in the QS classification
Region
Americas
QS regional grouping

University profile

About University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Editorial background written for orientation. Verify programs, funding, and admission on the university's official pages.

Research and engagement connect academic work with partners

University of Massachusetts, Amherst presents research, teaching, and engagement as connected parts of campus activity. Its Office of Research and Engagement describes work with academic, government, and private partners, alongside research administration, innovation, technology transfer, and community engagement. For a prospective researcher, this offers useful context about the environment around scholarly work. It does not define the academic route for an individual question. The right place to start is the degree, department, or programme that covers your field, followed by the research group or project that makes the question specific.

The university's central pages also identify a wide range of academic programmes and current research news. Use these resources to discover potential directions, but do not treat a programme list or news headline as a complete research profile. A headline may show an active area, while a department page identifies the curriculum and academic community behind it. Follow promising topics down to the local level and look for the methods, facilities, data, or research problems that overlap with your own experience.

Central research services are a map for research practice

UMass Amherst's research office makes policies, procedures, human-subjects guidance, research roles, training, and technology-transfer support publicly visible. These are useful signs that research is managed through shared practices as well as individual academic units. They can help you ask appropriate questions about an area of work, especially one that involves people, technical systems, partnership activity, or research outputs. They should not be used to assume that every programme follows the same process or uses the same services in the same way.

A practical reading method is to separate central context from local evidence. Central resources explain the infrastructure and expectations around research; the department, centre, laboratory, or group explains the work itself. Keep notes on both, but give more weight to the material closest to the field. This distinction prevents an institutional description from being mistaken for proof that a particular research path is available or appropriate for you.

Create a UMass Amherst comparison from specific evidence

A useful University of Massachusetts, Amherst record names the academic home, a current research setting, and the link to your own preparation. The link could come from a research method, coding, laboratory work, a thesis, field experience, a policy question, or professional practice. Write it in a way that makes the relationship testable. If the note could describe almost any university, it needs more detail from the local UMass Amherst sources.

Check the newest programme and group material before moving from research to a decision. Current information is more reliable than an older overview when you are considering a specific path. A carefully built note will show the question you want to pursue, the setting where it is being explored, and the evidence that connects your background to that work. UMass Amherst's central research office material can help you understand shared practice and engagement, while the programme or group itself establishes the research environment that is relevant to you. Its public office description also links research with innovation, technology transfer, and community engagement across the campus. That distinction remains useful.