Skip to main content
AcademicWings STEM discovery

QS ranking profile

University of Southern California

United States of America Private not for Profit

This page presents clearly labeled QS ranking data for orientation. It does not verify programs, supervisors, funding, admission requirements, or the university's website.

QS 2026 rank
#146
Down 21 places since 2025
QS 2025 rank
#125
Overall score
62.6
Verified Catalog STEM PhDs, Postdocs & Fellowships

Explore opportunities at University of Southern California

Browse active research positions, doctoral fellowships, and university funding calls indexed from official faculties and verified sources.

QS indicators

Reported ranking indicators

Each indicator is scored out of 100 in the same QS snapshot as the summary above.

Academic reputation 61.2

#167 worldwide

Employer reputation 69.6

#150 worldwide

Faculty-student ratio 19.6

#801 worldwide

Citations per faculty 66.2

#240 worldwide

International faculty ratio 15.8

#786 worldwide

International student ratio 81.2

#219 worldwide

International student diversity 82.9

#184 worldwide

International research network 87.8

#204 worldwide

Employment outcomes 98

#45 worldwide

Sustainability 92.1

#45 worldwide

Institution profile

How QS classifies this institution

QS groups institutions by size, subject range, and research output.

Size
Extra large
More than 30,000 students
Subject range
Focused
Teaches a limited range of faculty areas
Research intensity
Very high
Very high research output in the QS classification
Region
Americas
QS regional grouping

University profile

About University of Southern California

Editorial background written for orientation. Verify programs, funding, and admission on the university's official pages.

Choose the USC degree pathway before describing the research interest

The University of Southern California organizes graduate study through schools and departments, with some interdisciplinary fields drawing on faculty from more than one department. For an applicant, the first task is to identify the degree pathway that matches the work you want to do. USC distinguishes PhD study from professional doctorates, master's degrees, dual degrees, and progressive master's study. Those routes should not be treated as interchangeable. Begin with the exact degree title and the school or department that maintains its current information, then examine how that unit describes the research or advanced study involved.

The relevant school or department sets the curriculum and degree requirements, so it is the proper place to verify the academic structure of an option. A broad interest in a topic may connect to several USC units, each with a different approach. Reading the program material helps you see whether the route is built around original research, professional practice, a combined field, or another form of advanced study. This lets you compare your aims with the degree itself rather than using a university-wide description as if it answered every program-level question.

Research resources help clarify the environment around a project

USC's research pages describe support for scholarly inquiry, research integrity, training, centers and institutes, and shared resources. These elements can give useful context to a prospective research question. A center or institute may reveal an active area of work, a cross-disciplinary connection, or a resource relevant to a method. That context should be used carefully. It can help you understand the broader environment, but it does not replace the department or school that defines the degree route and its academic requirements.

Follow the visible connections between research activity and the program you are considering. A useful link may be a faculty affiliation, a project theme, a research method, a setting for applied work, or a topic that matches your prior experience. Write down what you can verify from the current material. If the connection depends only on a large center name or a broad field label, continue researching before treating it as evidence of fit. This keeps your shortlist grounded in specific academic information rather than in assumptions about access, supervision, or future project arrangements.

Use a USC evidence note to make the next comparison clearer

For every USC option, make a brief record that names the degree, the home school or department, the current program page, and any research setting that is directly relevant. Add an explanation of why your preparation connects to the route. That may involve an earlier thesis, an empirical or creative project, technical work, a professional problem, a body of evidence, or a question you have already begun to explore. The note is not a statement about an outcome. It is a practical way to see whether your interest has enough academic detail to justify further work.

Before acting on the option, revisit the live pages published by the program and responsible school. Research activity, staff interests, and program instructions can change over time. This profile is intended to guide a first investigation of USC, not to replace those current sources. When the degree pathway, identified research context, and your own evidence remain aligned after review, you can compare USC with other programs on a clearer academic basis and plan a focused next step.