QS ranking profile
University of Texas at Austin
This page presents clearly labeled QS ranking data for orientation. It does not verify programs, supervisors, funding, admission requirements, or the university's website.
- QS 2026 rank
- #68
- Down 2 places since 2025
- QS 2025 rank
- #66
- Overall score
- 76.4
Explore opportunities at University of Texas at Austin
Browse active research positions, doctoral fellowships, and university funding calls indexed from official faculties and verified sources.
QS indicators
Reported ranking indicators
Each indicator is scored out of 100 in the same QS snapshot as the summary above.
#39 worldwide
#38 worldwide
#801 worldwide
#122 worldwide
#801 worldwide
#742 worldwide
#801 worldwide
#169 worldwide
#82 worldwide
#308 worldwide
Institution profile
How QS classifies this institution
QS groups institutions by size, subject range, and research output.
- Size
- Extra large
- More than 30,000 students
- Subject range
- Focused
- Teaches a limited range of faculty areas
- Research intensity
- Very high
- Very high research output in the QS classification
- Region
- Americas
- QS regional grouping
University profile
About University of Texas at Austin
Editorial background written for orientation. Verify programs, funding, and admission on the university's official pages.
Map the degree before mapping the wider UT Austin campus
The University of Texas at Austin publishes a central graduate-program listing that connects degree names with program contacts, graduate advisers, and program pages. Use that structure to narrow a large academic environment into a real option. Start with the exact degree instead of an umbrella subject. A phrase such as computing, public policy, materials, education, health, or the arts can lead to several distinct programs with different academic homes. The degree page is the place to identify the unit that owns the route, the current description of the field, and the people or offices responsible for program information.
This is particularly helpful when two programs appear to address the same broad problem from different directions. One may be built around a disciplinary method, while another may bring the problem into a professional, scientific, or policy setting. Do not choose between them by title alone. Read each program's own language, compare the type of work it expects, and identify what you would actually want to investigate there. The strongest comparison is based on the relationship between your prior preparation and the program's current academic focus, not on the size or general reputation of the University.
Research centers can clarify an interdisciplinary question
UT Austin's research pages describe centers and units across colleges and schools, as well as shared facilities and research sites beyond the main campus. This breadth can help an applicant discover where a topic is being explored in practice. A research center may reveal a community, an approach, or a resource that makes a proposed question more concrete. It does not remove the need to identify the degree program that would provide the formal academic home. Treat the research map as a way to understand the environment around a question, then confirm how that environment relates to the graduate program you have identified.
The Graduate School also describes cross-disciplinary options such as portfolio programs and ad hoc interdisciplinary doctoral work. These sit alongside an established degree rather than replacing the need to choose one. For a prospective applicant, that is a useful signal to learn the structure of the home program before building an interdisciplinary story around it. A broad idea may be viable, but it still needs a clear disciplinary anchor, an appropriate academic adviser, and a workable plan for the research. Keep the first inquiry focused on the named degree and use wider campus resources to test, rather than inflate, the connection.
Turn a UT Austin interest into an evidence-led shortlist item
Make one concise record for every UT Austin program you are considering. Include the degree title, college or school, program page, the relevant research center or unit if there is one, and the academic question that links them. Then explain what you bring to the question. This might involve a prior thesis, quantitative work, archival research, a technical project, a professional setting, or a creative practice. Writing that connection in plain language is a useful test. If the record relies mostly on a campus-wide statement, return to the program page and keep researching until the fit becomes more specific.
Check the current materials again before moving from exploration to action. Individual programs maintain their own details, and research groups can change their focus, personnel, or public information over time. The aim is not to predict an outcome. It is to make sure that the degree, the research setting, and your planned work still form a coherent picture. A well-supported UT Austin note makes it easier to compare this option with others and to prepare a focused next step without relying on assumptions about the wider institution.